Measure-ability: The Paris Agreement’s Transparency Regime and the Making of the Calculating State

Abstract Transparency is at the center of the Paris climate regime and one of the key mechanisms by which it seeks to catalyze voluntary climate action. In this article, we analyze the micropolitics of transparency and the power that resides in the seemingly technical and mundane reporting provisions of the Paris Agreement. Informed by Michel Foucault’s decentered account of power and government, we trace the ways of thinking and reasoning that underpin the Paris Agreement’s push to disclose, measure, and evaluate climate performance and how its complex transparency apparatus seeks to arrange things so that states behave as they ought. We identify measure-ability as the governmentality that gives the Paris Agreement’s transparency regime a particular matrix of means and ends. It is a liberal form of climate rule, we argue, that seeks to foster measure-able states that do not need to be governed by others but will govern themselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.781
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measure-ability: The Paris Agreement’s Transparency Regime and the Making of the Calculating State

Aarti Gupta, Maria Jernnäs, Eva Lövbrand
Global Environmental Politics
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Measure-ability: The Paris Agreement’s Transparency Regime and the Making of the Calculating State

Aarti Gupta, Maria Jernnäs, Eva Lövbrand
article en

Abstract

Abstract Transparency is at the center of the Paris climate regime and one of the key mechanisms by which it seeks to catalyze voluntary climate action. In this article, we analyze the micropolitics of transparency and the power that resides in the seemingly technical and mundane reporting provisions of the Paris Agreement. Informed by Michel Foucault’s decentered account of power and government, we trace the ways of thinking and reasoning that underpin the Paris Agreement’s push to disclose, measure, and evaluate climate performance and how its complex transparency apparatus seeks to arrange things so that states behave as they ought. We identify measure-ability as the governmentality that gives the Paris Agreement’s transparency regime a particular matrix of means and ends. It is a liberal form of climate rule, we argue, that seeks to foster measure-able states that do not need to be governed by others but will govern themselves.

Global Environmental Politics
Medical Protective (US), Schlumberger (Ireland) (IE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.