ProcuRAG

Swedish public organizations have well-established processes for risk and vulnerability analyses when procuring software and applications, yet open access to applications categorized as enterprise social networking or online collaboration tools poses security risks. Security managers in those organizations are concerned about employees downloading without prior basic risk and vulnerability assessments. This behavior is attributed to employees’ lack of security knowledge rather than malicious intent. In response to this concern, the idea of supporting inexperienced employees was formulated as “better than nothing.” To investigate the idea, this pre-study examines whether an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant, in the form of a prototype called ProcuRAG, would fill the “nothing gap” by helping inexperienced employees apply a simple risk assessment through AI-generated summaries of extensive service-level agreement texts. The study uses an inductive approach, collecting qualitative data by having respondents, e.g., security managers and CISOs, discuss practice in relation to the prototype. Understanding respondents’ perceptions of the support an AI assistant would provide is central to the study, rather than the prototype’s technical features. The study suggests that an AI assistant like ProcuRAG can help raise security behavior, particularly by guiding users on the types of questions they need to answer. However, the study also indicates that an AI assistant could bypass the formal, established process, potentially reducing the organization’s control over which software or applications are downloaded and used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/a1039
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ProcuRAG

Daniel Innala Ahlmark, Johan Lugnet, Åsa Ericson
The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society
AI in Service Interactions
article

ProcuRAG

Daniel Innala Ahlmark, Johan Lugnet, Åsa Ericson
article en

Abstract

Swedish public organizations have well-established processes for risk and vulnerability analyses when procuring software and applications, yet open access to applications categorized as enterprise social networking or online collaboration tools poses security risks. Security managers in those organizations are concerned about employees downloading without prior basic risk and vulnerability assessments. This behavior is attributed to employees’ lack of security knowledge rather than malicious intent. In response to this concern, the idea of supporting inexperienced employees was formulated as “better than nothing.” To investigate the idea, this pre-study examines whether an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant, in the form of a prototype called ProcuRAG, would fill the “nothing gap” by helping inexperienced employees apply a simple risk assessment through AI-generated summaries of extensive service-level agreement texts. The study uses an inductive approach, collecting qualitative data by having respondents, e.g., security managers and CISOs, discuss practice in relation to the prototype. Understanding respondents’ perceptions of the support an AI assistant would provide is central to the study, rather than the prototype’s technical features. The study suggests that an AI assistant like ProcuRAG can help raise security behavior, particularly by guiding users on the types of questions they need to answer. However, the study also indicates that an AI assistant could bypass the formal, established process, potentially reducing the organization’s control over which software or applications are downloaded and used.

The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.