The Impact of Malocclusion Severity on the Number of Prescribed, Used Aligners and Treatment Duration; A Retrospective, Singe‐Centre, Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of baseline malocclusion severity on the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An unrestricted, independent search was conducted on the Invisalign ClinCheck database of a private practice for patients without any missing anterior teeth and whose treatment was finished between April 2021 and December 2024. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the feature selection Boruta algorithm (random forest algorithm) was implemented to identify important predictors for the number of aligners (prescribed, used) and treatment duration. RESULTS: A total of 404 patients were included (age: 29.57 [10.7] years). Mean numbers of prescribed, used and unused aligners were 72.21 (37.52), 65.63 (30.40) and 6.57 (14.09), respectively. Important predictors of the numbers of the prescribed and used aligners were relatively similar and included molar and canine relationships, maxillary crowding, overjet, presence and number of missing or extracted posterior teeth, overbite, presence and number of teeth in posterior crossbite and midline discrepancies. Treatment duration was associated with baseline maxillary crowding, molar and canine relationships, overjet, overbite, midline discrepancies and the presence and number of missing or extracted posterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Factors related to the baseline malocclusion severity significantly affect the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration. This information could be used for informed practice and patient communication, including future evaluation of the biological and environmental footprint of aligners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70167
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Malocclusion Severity on the Number of Prescribed, Used Aligners and Treatment Duration; A Retrospective, Singe‐Centre, Cohort Study

Christodoulos Laspos, Alexandra K. Papadopoulou, Effimia Koumpia, Nikolaos Pandis et al.
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

The Impact of Malocclusion Severity on the Number of Prescribed, Used Aligners and Treatment Duration; A Retrospective, Singe‐Centre, Cohort Study

Christodoulos Laspos, Alexandra K. Papadopoulou, Effimia Koumpia, Nikolaos Pandis, Angeliki Anna Gkinosati, Candice Durgnat
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of baseline malocclusion severity on the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An unrestricted, independent search was conducted on the Invisalign ClinCheck database of a private practice for patients without any missing anterior teeth and whose treatment was finished between April 2021 and December 2024. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the feature selection Boruta algorithm (random forest algorithm) was implemented to identify important predictors for the number of aligners (prescribed, used) and treatment duration. RESULTS: A total of 404 patients were included (age: 29.57 [10.7] years). Mean numbers of prescribed, used and unused aligners were 72.21 (37.52), 65.63 (30.40) and 6.57 (14.09), respectively. Important predictors of the numbers of the prescribed and used aligners were relatively similar and included molar and canine relationships, maxillary crowding, overjet, presence and number of missing or extracted posterior teeth, overbite, presence and number of teeth in posterior crossbite and midline discrepancies. Treatment duration was associated with baseline maxillary crowding, molar and canine relationships, overjet, overbite, midline discrepancies and the presence and number of missing or extracted posterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Factors related to the baseline malocclusion severity significantly affect the number of prescribed, used aligners and treatment duration. This information could be used for informed practice and patient communication, including future evaluation of the biological and environmental footprint of aligners.

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
University of Geneva (CH), University of Bern (CH), The University of Sydney (AU), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), European University Cyprus (CY), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.