Getting along, getting ahead, and sometimes getting it wrong: A socioanalytic perspective on lead founder personality and team dynamics

New venture teams represent the dominant organizing structure in entrepreneurship, but research typically treats teams as collective entities or compositional inputs, which overlooks the potential influence of a lead founder. I argue that lead founder personality shapes new venture performance through team innovation and relationship conflict, with effects that shift across trait intensity from beneficial to detrimental. Using time-lagged, multi-source data (N = 136 lead founders and teams), I find that Machiavellianism and psychopathy show inverted U-shaped relationships with innovation and U-shaped relationships with conflict. Further, new venture performance effects are transmitted through two mediators: positive effects via innovation at lower trait levels and negative effects via relationship conflict at higher levels. In contrast, narcissism shows only a linear relationship with innovation and no association with relationship conflict. This study highlights the dual social functions of lead founder personality by identifying when “getting along” is a strategic path to “getting ahead” and when failing to manage that balance gets it wrong.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Small Business Management
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2026.2698768
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting along, getting ahead, and sometimes getting it wrong: A socioanalytic perspective on lead founder personality and team dynamics

Katrina M. Brownell
Journal of Small Business Management
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Getting along, getting ahead, and sometimes getting it wrong: A socioanalytic perspective on lead founder personality and team dynamics

Katrina M. Brownell
article en

Abstract

New venture teams represent the dominant organizing structure in entrepreneurship, but research typically treats teams as collective entities or compositional inputs, which overlooks the potential influence of a lead founder. I argue that lead founder personality shapes new venture performance through team innovation and relationship conflict, with effects that shift across trait intensity from beneficial to detrimental. Using time-lagged, multi-source data (N = 136 lead founders and teams), I find that Machiavellianism and psychopathy show inverted U-shaped relationships with innovation and U-shaped relationships with conflict. Further, new venture performance effects are transmitted through two mediators: positive effects via innovation at lower trait levels and negative effects via relationship conflict at higher levels. In contrast, narcissism shows only a linear relationship with innovation and no association with relationship conflict. This study highlights the dual social functions of lead founder personality by identifying when “getting along” is a strategic path to “getting ahead” and when failing to manage that balance gets it wrong.

Journal of Small Business Management
Virginia Tech (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Getting along, getting ahead, and sometimes getting it wrong: A socioanalytic perspective on lead founder personality and team dynamics — Katrina M. Brownell · Journal of Small Business Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS