Sensitivity analysis of modeled soil water dynamics within variable rate irrigation zones for winter wheat

Abstract Understanding within-field and season variability of soil water supply and crop water stress is critical for successful variable-rate irrigation (VRI) management. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess within-field variability of field capacity (FC), wilting point (WP), total available water (TAW), and initial soil volumetric water content (VWC init ); (2) validate a water balance model based on the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) standardized Penman-Monteith estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) using measured within-field VWC; and (3) evaluate the model sensitivity to FC, WP, VWC init , and crop coefficients. A 22-ha field of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) near Grace, Idaho, United Sates of America was delineated into zones and managed with VRI. Spatial variability of soil water characteristics among 102 sites was measured in the field: FC (355–488 mm), WP (103–153 mm), TAW (230–361 mm), and VWC init (325–464 mm) in a 1.2 m soil profile. Model validation against measured VWC resulted in root mean square error (RMSE) values of 23.2–61.3 mm for different sampling dates. These RMSE values showed the ability to model within-field spatially variable soil water dynamics and crop water stress. The model showed high sensitivity of predicted ET and soil water depletion output values to FC and VWC init inputs, but lower sensitivity to WP. The sensitivity analysis also suggested spatially variable crop coefficients improve prediction of spatially variable ET rates. The model validation highlights opportunities for a spatially variable modelling approach, while the model’s sensitivity to soil and crop parameters highlights practical limitations to scheduling VRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irrigation Science
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-026-01150-0
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity analysis of modeled soil water dynamics within variable rate irrigation zones for winter wheat

Elisa A. Flint, Alon Ben‐Gal, Neil C. Hansen, Ruth Kerry et al.
Irrigation Science
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Sensitivity analysis of modeled soil water dynamics within variable rate irrigation zones for winter wheat

Elisa A. Flint, Alon Ben‐Gal, Neil C. Hansen, Ruth Kerry, Austin Hopkins, Bryan G. Hopkins, Matt Yost, Jeffrey D. Svedin, Ryan R. Jensen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding within-field and season variability of soil water supply and crop water stress is critical for successful variable-rate irrigation (VRI) management. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess within-field variability of field capacity (FC), wilting point (WP), total available water (TAW), and initial soil volumetric water content (VWC init ); (2) validate a water balance model based on the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) standardized Penman-Monteith estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) using measured within-field VWC; and (3) evaluate the model sensitivity to FC, WP, VWC init , and crop coefficients. A 22-ha field of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) near Grace, Idaho, United Sates of America was delineated into zones and managed with VRI. Spatial variability of soil water characteristics among 102 sites was measured in the field: FC (355–488 mm), WP (103–153 mm), TAW (230–361 mm), and VWC init (325–464 mm) in a 1.2 m soil profile. Model validation against measured VWC resulted in root mean square error (RMSE) values of 23.2–61.3 mm for different sampling dates. These RMSE values showed the ability to model within-field spatially variable soil water dynamics and crop water stress. The model showed high sensitivity of predicted ET and soil water depletion output values to FC and VWC init inputs, but lower sensitivity to WP. The sensitivity analysis also suggested spatially variable crop coefficients improve prediction of spatially variable ET rates. The model validation highlights opportunities for a spatially variable modelling approach, while the model’s sensitivity to soil and crop parameters highlights practical limitations to scheduling VRI.

Irrigation ScienceVol. 44(5)
Brigham Young University (US), Utah State University (US), Washington State University Tri-Cities (US), Agricultural Research Organization (IL), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, Brigham Young University, Johns Hopkins University, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.