Differential Motor System Activation in Chemistry Problem Solving: Gesture‐Based Versus Model‐Based Instruction

ABSTRACT Gesture‐based instruction enhances spatial problem‐solving accuracy, yet the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms remain unclear. This study examines whether gesture enhances spatial problem‐solving in organic chemistry through activation patterns more consistent with offloading cognitive effort or coupling motor and working memory systems. Using functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we compared students (68 recruited; n = 64 with usable fNIRS data) trained to translate between molecular diagrams using gesture‐based or model‐based instruction. Behavioral data revealed higher accuracy in the gesture‐based compared to the model‐based condition. In the fNIRS data, although channel‐level condition effects did not survive FDR correction, exploratory ROI‐level analyses showed increased activation in premotor and motor planning regions (BA 6) for the gesture group, whereas the model‐based learners exhibited greater dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 46) activation to suggest higher executive control demands. These findings provide preliminary neurocognitive evidence consistent with offloading and show that gesture and physical models promote different problem‐solving strategies after embodied STEM instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mind Brain and Education
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.70056
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Motor System Activation in Chemistry Problem Solving: Gesture‐Based Versus Model‐Based Instruction

Ö. Ece Demir‐Lira, Mike Stieff, Matthew Lira, Sam Clingan-Siverly
Mind Brain and Education
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Differential Motor System Activation in Chemistry Problem Solving: Gesture‐Based Versus Model‐Based Instruction

Ö. Ece Demir‐Lira, Mike Stieff, Matthew Lira, Sam Clingan-Siverly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gesture‐based instruction enhances spatial problem‐solving accuracy, yet the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms remain unclear. This study examines whether gesture enhances spatial problem‐solving in organic chemistry through activation patterns more consistent with offloading cognitive effort or coupling motor and working memory systems. Using functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we compared students (68 recruited; n = 64 with usable fNIRS data) trained to translate between molecular diagrams using gesture‐based or model‐based instruction. Behavioral data revealed higher accuracy in the gesture‐based compared to the model‐based condition. In the fNIRS data, although channel‐level condition effects did not survive FDR correction, exploratory ROI‐level analyses showed increased activation in premotor and motor planning regions (BA 6) for the gesture group, whereas the model‐based learners exhibited greater dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 46) activation to suggest higher executive control demands. These findings provide preliminary neurocognitive evidence consistent with offloading and show that gesture and physical models promote different problem‐solving strategies after embodied STEM instruction.

Mind Brain and EducationVol. 20(3)
University of Iowa (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.