Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors in predicting outcomes for neck pain: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that contributes to significant global burden. Evidence on physical measures of functioning as prognostic factors for neck pain remains limited. The objective of this study is to investigate whether physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors predict outcomes for people with neck pain. METHODS: This protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study will recruit approximately 156 adults with neck pain of any duration. Physical measures of physical functioning including impairment, performance, and activity measures in a real environment, will be assessed as prognostic factors. Outcomes at 12-month follow-up will include pain, disability, and overall changes, assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Global Rating of Change (GROC), respectively. Hierarchical regression analyses will be conducted separately for each physical measure and outcome. Physical measures will first be entered alone to examine the initial unadjusted (bivariate) association with the outcome, followed by adjustment for covariates (age, sex and baseline NPRS/NDI). Additional contribution will be evaluated using changes in explained variance ΔR2 and F-change statistics. Physical measures demonstrating additional contribution will subsequently be entered into the final penalized multivariable regression model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to reduce overfitting and identify the most relevant prognostic factors. Sensitivity analyses comparing penalized and non-penalized multivariable regression models will also be conducted to examine the consistency and stability of the findings. Prognostic effects will be reported as beta coefficients (β) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each model will be internally validated using bootstrapping, with model performance evaluated using calibration and discrimination. DISCUSSION: This study will provide new insights into how physical measures of physical functioning relate to outcomes for neck pain. The resulting prognostic models have the potential to strengthen clinical decision-making, support personalized care, and guide the development of targeted interventions for people with neck pain. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol has prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF). The link is https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HG6PJ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354102
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors in predicting outcomes for neck pain: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study

Rabea Begum, Paul Parikh, Alison Rushton, David Walton
PLoS ONE
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors in predicting outcomes for neck pain: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study

Rabea Begum, Paul Parikh, Alison Rushton, David Walton
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that contributes to significant global burden. Evidence on physical measures of functioning as prognostic factors for neck pain remains limited. The objective of this study is to investigate whether physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors predict outcomes for people with neck pain. METHODS: This protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study will recruit approximately 156 adults with neck pain of any duration. Physical measures of physical functioning including impairment, performance, and activity measures in a real environment, will be assessed as prognostic factors. Outcomes at 12-month follow-up will include pain, disability, and overall changes, assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Global Rating of Change (GROC), respectively. Hierarchical regression analyses will be conducted separately for each physical measure and outcome. Physical measures will first be entered alone to examine the initial unadjusted (bivariate) association with the outcome, followed by adjustment for covariates (age, sex and baseline NPRS/NDI). Additional contribution will be evaluated using changes in explained variance ΔR2 and F-change statistics. Physical measures demonstrating additional contribution will subsequently be entered into the final penalized multivariable regression model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to reduce overfitting and identify the most relevant prognostic factors. Sensitivity analyses comparing penalized and non-penalized multivariable regression models will also be conducted to examine the consistency and stability of the findings. Prognostic effects will be reported as beta coefficients (β) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each model will be internally validated using bootstrapping, with model performance evaluated using calibration and discrimination. DISCUSSION: This study will provide new insights into how physical measures of physical functioning relate to outcomes for neck pain. The resulting prognostic models have the potential to strengthen clinical decision-making, support personalized care, and guide the development of targeted interventions for people with neck pain. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol has prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF). The link is https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HG6PJ.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Western University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.