‘Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me’: Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia

BACKGROUND: Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) are contested practices in mental healthcare due to unresolved evidence of effectiveness and persistent human rights concerns. Despite this, Australia has high rates of CTO use internationally. Research from a lived and living experience (LLE) perspective remains limited. METHODS: This mixed methods research explored experiences of people with LLE of mental ill-health and being on a CTO ('consumers'). An online survey including Likert-rated, categorical and open-ended questions was disseminated across Australia in 2024 to consumers aged 18 years or over. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using Latent Content Analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three people completed the survey; most identified as female (86%); 51.2% were aged 30-49 years; 7.2% were currently on a CTO; 40.5% had been on a CTO in the past 1-5 years; and 45.2% had been on a CTO more than once. Automated data contamination ('bot') infiltration hampered inclusion of further data. Participant responses included: (1) experiences prior to being on a CTO; (2) experiences whilst on a CTO; (3) attitudes towards CTOs; (4) family involvement; and (5) views on mental health services. While some consumers reported experiencing positive care, many rejected use of CTOs, reporting coercion, exclusion from decision-making and information, lack of alternative support options, and lack of compassion. CONCLUSIONS: Policy and practice reforms, including focus on recovery and human rights, appear to have failed to improve experiences of CTOs. Further work to close the policy-practice gap and translate policy into more inclusive, human rights-based care is indicated. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: This project has included considerable involvement and community engagement with people with lived and living experience ('LLE') of CTOs and/or mental health service use in all phases of the project. The project includes two Chief Investigators who identify as LLE leaders and researchers (VE and SL), and who have direct lived experience of CTOs, or as a family/caregiver of individuals who have direct lived experience of CTOs. The project manager (TZ) and some project staff (TS, TK, and PS) are LLE researchers, and the project is guided by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) with LLE experience of CTOs, including both service users and family/caregivers. We also have LLE experts on our project's international advisory panel. Together, their contributions have been vital in the project team's open and transparent reflections on their diverse perspectives and positioning which have grounded the project's focus on LLE perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70770
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me’: Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia

Edwina M. Light, Elaine Waddell, Vrinda Edan, Tessa‐May Zirnsak et al.
Health Expectations
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

‘Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me’: Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia

Edwina M. Light, Elaine Waddell, Vrinda Edan, Tessa‐May Zirnsak, Chris Maylea, Steve R Kisely, Sharon Lawn, Christopher Ryan, Lisa Brophy, Giles Newton-Howes, Gabriele Fischer, Morgan Gould, Puneet Sansanwal, T.J. Spencer, Penelope Weller, Tarmia Klass
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) are contested practices in mental healthcare due to unresolved evidence of effectiveness and persistent human rights concerns. Despite this, Australia has high rates of CTO use internationally. Research from a lived and living experience (LLE) perspective remains limited. METHODS: This mixed methods research explored experiences of people with LLE of mental ill-health and being on a CTO ('consumers'). An online survey including Likert-rated, categorical and open-ended questions was disseminated across Australia in 2024 to consumers aged 18 years or over. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using Latent Content Analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three people completed the survey; most identified as female (86%); 51.2% were aged 30-49 years; 7.2% were currently on a CTO; 40.5% had been on a CTO in the past 1-5 years; and 45.2% had been on a CTO more than once. Automated data contamination ('bot') infiltration hampered inclusion of further data. Participant responses included: (1) experiences prior to being on a CTO; (2) experiences whilst on a CTO; (3) attitudes towards CTOs; (4) family involvement; and (5) views on mental health services. While some consumers reported experiencing positive care, many rejected use of CTOs, reporting coercion, exclusion from decision-making and information, lack of alternative support options, and lack of compassion. CONCLUSIONS: Policy and practice reforms, including focus on recovery and human rights, appear to have failed to improve experiences of CTOs. Further work to close the policy-practice gap and translate policy into more inclusive, human rights-based care is indicated. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: This project has included considerable involvement and community engagement with people with lived and living experience ('LLE') of CTOs and/or mental health service use in all phases of the project. The project includes two Chief Investigators who identify as LLE leaders and researchers (VE and SL), and who have direct lived experience of CTOs, or as a family/caregiver of individuals who have direct lived experience of CTOs. The project manager (TZ) and some project staff (TS, TK, and PS) are LLE researchers, and the project is guided by a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) with LLE experience of CTOs, including both service users and family/caregivers. We also have LLE experts on our project's international advisory panel. Together, their contributions have been vital in the project team's open and transparent reflections on their diverse perspectives and positioning which have grounded the project's focus on LLE perspectives.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(4)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), University of South Australia (AU), La Trobe University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Metro South Health (AU), MIT University (MK), Health Awareness (United States) (US), University of Otago (NZ), RMIT University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.