Cardiovascular Health Across Gender Identities: Life's Essential 8 in the PRIDE Study

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the cardiovascular health of sexual and gender minority adults across the sex and gender spectrum. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score in sexual and gender minority adults in The PRIDE (Population Research in Identity and Disparities for Equality) Study. Using a validated algorithm, self-reported gender identity was categorized: cisgender men, cisgender women, gender-expansive people assigned female at birth, gender-expansive people assigned male at birth, transgender men, and transgender women. We used linear regression to calculate the mean composite LE8 score (primary outcome) and mean LE8 component scores (secondary outcome) across groups. RESULTS: Among the 4964 participants, the median age was 36.4 (interquartile range, 28.9-51.9) years, 49.7% (n=2398) were transgender or gender-expansive, and 1100 (22.2%) respondents used gender-affirming hormone therapy. Composite LE8 scores ranged from 70.3 (95% CI, 68.5-72.1) in transgender women to 72.9 (95% CI, 72.3-73.6) in gender-expansive people assigned female at birth, with no difference by gender-affirming hormone therapy use. Mean LE8 component scores differed significantly between groups, including a high prevalence of unfavorable body mass index scores in cisgender women and gender-expansive people assigned female at birth, unfavorable nicotine scores in gender-expansive people assigned male at birth and transgender men, and unfavorable sleep scores in transgender men and transgender women. Overall, participants had favorable physical activity and glucose scores and unfavorable diet scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of sexual and gender minority adults, the significant differences in the prevalence of unfavorable LE8 component scores between groups highlight the importance of population-specific interventions in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.044329
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular Health Across Gender Identities: Life's Essential 8 in the PRIDE Study

Juno Obedin‐Maliver, Nicole Rosendale, Carl G. Streed, Billy A. Caceres et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Cardiovascular Health Across Gender Identities: Life's Essential 8 in the PRIDE Study

Juno Obedin‐Maliver, Nicole Rosendale, Carl G. Streed, Billy A. Caceres, Mitchell R. Lunn, Rose Wong, Annesa Flentje, Andrew J. Wood
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the cardiovascular health of sexual and gender minority adults across the sex and gender spectrum. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score in sexual and gender minority adults in The PRIDE (Population Research in Identity and Disparities for Equality) Study. Using a validated algorithm, self-reported gender identity was categorized: cisgender men, cisgender women, gender-expansive people assigned female at birth, gender-expansive people assigned male at birth, transgender men, and transgender women. We used linear regression to calculate the mean composite LE8 score (primary outcome) and mean LE8 component scores (secondary outcome) across groups. RESULTS: Among the 4964 participants, the median age was 36.4 (interquartile range, 28.9-51.9) years, 49.7% (n=2398) were transgender or gender-expansive, and 1100 (22.2%) respondents used gender-affirming hormone therapy. Composite LE8 scores ranged from 70.3 (95% CI, 68.5-72.1) in transgender women to 72.9 (95% CI, 72.3-73.6) in gender-expansive people assigned female at birth, with no difference by gender-affirming hormone therapy use. Mean LE8 component scores differed significantly between groups, including a high prevalence of unfavorable body mass index scores in cisgender women and gender-expansive people assigned female at birth, unfavorable nicotine scores in gender-expansive people assigned male at birth and transgender men, and unfavorable sleep scores in transgender men and transgender women. Overall, participants had favorable physical activity and glucose scores and unfavorable diet scores. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of sexual and gender minority adults, the significant differences in the prevalence of unfavorable LE8 component scores between groups highlight the importance of population-specific interventions in future research.

Journal of the American Heart Association
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Columbia University (US), Stanford University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.