Working memory strategies in children aged 7–10 years

While working memory strategies are well documented in adults, little is known about the use and effectiveness of these strategies in children. This study examined self-reported strategy use in children aged 7-10 years on working memory tasks, including those with demands related to everyday and classroom activities. Participants were a subset of 63 children from a working memory training trial in primary school-aged children that found no intervention effects up to 6 months post intervention. At the immediate post-intervention follow-up, children completed five working memory tasks: two backward span tasks (letters and digits), two following instructions tasks (letters and objects), and one n-back task (objects). Children then participated in a semi-structured one-on-one interview about the strategies they used on each task. Strategy use was prevalent across all working memory tasks and was generally associated with superior performance. A range of task-general and task-specific strategies were reported. Participants tended to rely on a single rather than multiple strategies, and more often favored a manipulation rather than maintenance strategy type. While certain strategies, the number of strategies used, and strategy type were linked to superior performance on select working memory tasks, the associations were not consistent across all tasks. These results show that strategic behavior during middle childhood, as in adults, is linked to performance on working memory tasks related to everyday and classroom activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory & Cognition
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-026-01916-z
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working memory strategies in children aged 7–10 years

Joshua F. Wiley, Regine Cassandra Lau, Caitlin Hrysanidis, Susan Gathercole et al.
Memory & Cognition
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Working memory strategies in children aged 7–10 years

Joshua F. Wiley, Regine Cassandra Lau, Caitlin Hrysanidis, Susan Gathercole, Megan Spencer-Smith, Peter J. Anderson, Linda Ramirez Herrera
article en

Abstract

While working memory strategies are well documented in adults, little is known about the use and effectiveness of these strategies in children. This study examined self-reported strategy use in children aged 7-10 years on working memory tasks, including those with demands related to everyday and classroom activities. Participants were a subset of 63 children from a working memory training trial in primary school-aged children that found no intervention effects up to 6 months post intervention. At the immediate post-intervention follow-up, children completed five working memory tasks: two backward span tasks (letters and digits), two following instructions tasks (letters and objects), and one n-back task (objects). Children then participated in a semi-structured one-on-one interview about the strategies they used on each task. Strategy use was prevalent across all working memory tasks and was generally associated with superior performance. A range of task-general and task-specific strategies were reported. Participants tended to rely on a single rather than multiple strategies, and more often favored a manipulation rather than maintenance strategy type. While certain strategies, the number of strategies used, and strategy type were linked to superior performance on select working memory tasks, the associations were not consistent across all tasks. These results show that strategic behavior during middle childhood, as in adults, is linked to performance on working memory tasks related to everyday and classroom activities.

Memory & Cognition
Children's Hospital of Orange County (US), MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), University of California, Irvine (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Australian Government, Tan Kah Kee Foundation, Monash University, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.