Before Trust: AI Literacy and Purpose-First Mode Selection as the Missing Foundation of Human–AI Interaction

Artificial intelligence research has increasingly focused on trust, controllability, transparency, and governance. This paper argues that a more fundamental layer precedes all of these: users often lack a clear mental model of what AI is, how it should be used, and how to manage the interaction itself — a gap documented across recent surveys of user mental models, agentic controllability, and trust-centered interface design, but rarely addressed directly as a prerequisite skill. Building on emerging work on criteria-based interaction mode selection and on interface friction as a countermeasure to over-reliance, we propose AI literacy as the foundational layer of human–AI interaction, operationalized through purpose-first Mode Selection — a taxonomy of Work, Brainstorm, and Companion modes — and Functional Minimalism, a design principle intended to preserve critical distance in high-risk or emotionally salient interactions. We position both proposals explicitly against existing literature, distinguish our contribution from closely related prior work, and identify the empirical validation this framework still requires.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21407265
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Before Trust: AI Literacy and Purpose-First Mode Selection as the Missing Foundation of Human–AI Interaction

Rick Clinton
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
preprint

Before Trust: AI Literacy and Purpose-First Mode Selection as the Missing Foundation of Human–AI Interaction

Rick Clinton
preprint en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence research has increasingly focused on trust, controllability, transparency, and governance. This paper argues that a more fundamental layer precedes all of these: users often lack a clear mental model of what AI is, how it should be used, and how to manage the interaction itself — a gap documented across recent surveys of user mental models, agentic controllability, and trust-centered interface design, but rarely addressed directly as a prerequisite skill. Building on emerging work on criteria-based interaction mode selection and on interface friction as a countermeasure to over-reliance, we propose AI literacy as the foundational layer of human–AI interaction, operationalized through purpose-first Mode Selection — a taxonomy of Work, Brainstorm, and Companion modes — and Functional Minimalism, a design principle intended to preserve critical distance in high-risk or emotionally salient interactions. We position both proposals explicitly against existing literature, distinguish our contribution from closely related prior work, and identify the empirical validation this framework still requires.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.