Liver parenchymal quality stratifies outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at two tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Results: Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 77.0%, 76.2%, and 64.1%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved 5-year OS of 84.6%. Conclusions: Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000963
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liver parenchymal quality stratifies outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Julie K. Heimbach, M. Truty, Jennifer L. Leiting, David Pereyra et al.
Liver Transplantation
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Liver parenchymal quality stratifies outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Julie K. Heimbach, M. Truty, Jennifer L. Leiting, David Pereyra, Jonas Santol, Matthias Ilmer, Laura Helmreich, Yawen Dong, Jule Dingfelder, Beat Moeckli, Susanne G Warner, V. Podrascanin, Omar Haque, Iwan Wukits, Li Z, Florian Lehner, Georg Gyoeri, Niall P. Hardy, Timucin Taner, Patrick P. Starlinger, Thomas Gruenberger, Michael L. Kendrick, Jessica Heard, Rory L. Smoot, Soeren Holst
article en

Abstract

Background: Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at two tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Results: Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 77.0%, 76.2%, and 64.1%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved 5-year OS of 84.6%. Conclusions: Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

Liver Transplantation
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT), Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US), Fachhochschule Wiener Neustadt (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.