Reconfiguring Indian Feminist Theory Through Ambedkarite Lens

The paper examines how mainstream Indian feminist thoughts are flawed in the epistemic formation itself. The paper situates women’s liberation within the broader project of dismantling caste and class hierarchies. It argues that unlike earlier feminist movements in India, which largely focused on reform within existing social structures, Ambedkar identified caste as the foundational mechanism of women’s oppression. Through a critical analysis of his writings, legislative interventions, and socio-political activism, the paper demonstrates that Ambedkar’s feminist vision is inseparable from his critique of Brahmanical patriarchy. It further contrasts his approach with nineteenth- and early twentieth-century reformist and nationalist feminisms, which often failed to interrogate structural inequalities. Drawing on scholars such as Uma Chakravarti, Sharmila Rege, Gopal Guru, and Gail Omvedt, the paper situates Ambedkar as a foundational thinker of Dalit feminism and intersectional critique in India. It concludes by critically examining why, despite significant legal and political interventions, the goals of women’s emancipation and annihilation of caste remain only partially realized.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21416994
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconfiguring Indian Feminist Theory Through Ambedkarite Lens

Channabasappa B. Inalli
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
article

Reconfiguring Indian Feminist Theory Through Ambedkarite Lens

Channabasappa B. Inalli
article en

Abstract

The paper examines how mainstream Indian feminist thoughts are flawed in the epistemic formation itself. The paper situates women’s liberation within the broader project of dismantling caste and class hierarchies. It argues that unlike earlier feminist movements in India, which largely focused on reform within existing social structures, Ambedkar identified caste as the foundational mechanism of women’s oppression. Through a critical analysis of his writings, legislative interventions, and socio-political activism, the paper demonstrates that Ambedkar’s feminist vision is inseparable from his critique of Brahmanical patriarchy. It further contrasts his approach with nineteenth- and early twentieth-century reformist and nationalist feminisms, which often failed to interrogate structural inequalities. Drawing on scholars such as Uma Chakravarti, Sharmila Rege, Gopal Guru, and Gail Omvedt, the paper situates Ambedkar as a foundational thinker of Dalit feminism and intersectional critique in India. It concludes by critically examining why, despite significant legal and political interventions, the goals of women’s emancipation and annihilation of caste remain only partially realized.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.