Dynamic changes in amygdala and insula responses to the onset and offset of conditioned stimuli during threat learning

The amygdala and insula are central to learning how to anticipate and respond to threats, yet their precise roles during different phases of fear conditioning remain incompletely understood. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine amygdala and insula responses in a large sample (N = 286) of adult twins during fear conditioning. Participants were exposed to two virtual characters: one (CS +) was paired with a mild electric shock (US) on 50% of acquisition trials (partial reinforcement), while the other (CS -) was never paired with the US. During habituation, neither the amygdala nor the insula discriminated between the cues. During acquisition, amygdala responses were strongest and most consistent at CS + offset on non-reinforced CS + trials (i.e., when the US was expected but omitted), whereas insula responses differentiated CS + from CS - at both CS onset and CS offset. Whole-brain analyses showed that CS differentiation at CS onset expanded from early engagement of anterior insula and temporal regions to broader networks as learning progressed. CS differentiation at CS offset (non-reinforced CS + > CS -) emerged in posterior insula and extended to broader predominantly contralateral networks in later acquisition blocks. Voxel-wise pattern similarity analyses indicated high within-event similarity across acquisition blocks (onset-with-onset; offset-with-offset), but lower similarity between event types (onset vs offset) and between either CS-related event and the US. Together, these findings are consistent with partially distinct large-scale activation patterns across cue onset, omission-related cue offset, and US delivery during threat learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62910-8
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic changes in amygdala and insula responses to the onset and offset of conditioned stimuli during threat learning

Granit Kastrati, Jörgen Rosén, Fredrik Åhs, Olle Berggren
Scientific Reports
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
article

Dynamic changes in amygdala and insula responses to the onset and offset of conditioned stimuli during threat learning

Granit Kastrati, Jörgen Rosén, Fredrik Åhs, Olle Berggren
article en

Abstract

The amygdala and insula are central to learning how to anticipate and respond to threats, yet their precise roles during different phases of fear conditioning remain incompletely understood. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine amygdala and insula responses in a large sample (N = 286) of adult twins during fear conditioning. Participants were exposed to two virtual characters: one (CS +) was paired with a mild electric shock (US) on 50% of acquisition trials (partial reinforcement), while the other (CS -) was never paired with the US. During habituation, neither the amygdala nor the insula discriminated between the cues. During acquisition, amygdala responses were strongest and most consistent at CS + offset on non-reinforced CS + trials (i.e., when the US was expected but omitted), whereas insula responses differentiated CS + from CS - at both CS onset and CS offset. Whole-brain analyses showed that CS differentiation at CS onset expanded from early engagement of anterior insula and temporal regions to broader networks as learning progressed. CS differentiation at CS offset (non-reinforced CS + > CS -) emerged in posterior insula and extended to broader predominantly contralateral networks in later acquisition blocks. Voxel-wise pattern similarity analyses indicated high within-event similarity across acquisition blocks (onset-with-onset; offset-with-offset), but lower similarity between event types (onset vs offset) and between either CS-related event and the US. Together, these findings are consistent with partially distinct large-scale activation patterns across cue onset, omission-related cue offset, and US delivery during threat learning.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Mid Sweden University (SE)
Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.