How Knowledge Brokers Shape the Evidence-Based Policy Landscape

Abstract Knowledge brokers, usually conceptualized as passive intermediaries between scientists and policymakers in evidence-based policymaking, are understudied in the philosophy of science. Here, we challenge that usual conceptualization. As agents in their own right, knowledge brokers have their own goals and incentives, which complicate the effects of their presence at the science–policy interface.We illustrate this in an agent-based model and suggest several avenues for further exploration of the role of knowledge brokers in evidence-based policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10248
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Knowledge Brokers Shape the Evidence-Based Policy Landscape

Hannah Rubin, Chad L. Hewitt, Katie Woolaston, Remco Heesen et al.
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

How Knowledge Brokers Shape the Evidence-Based Policy Landscape

Hannah Rubin, Chad L. Hewitt, Katie Woolaston, Remco Heesen, Emelda E. Chukwu, Anne Schwenkenbecher, Evangelina Schwindt, Veli Mitova, Mike D. Schneider, Alejandro Bortolus, Temitope O. Sogbanmu, Ricardo Kaufer, Hanna Metzen, Helena Slanickova, Li-an Yu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge brokers, usually conceptualized as passive intermediaries between scientists and policymakers in evidence-based policymaking, are understudied in the philosophy of science. Here, we challenge that usual conceptualization. As agents in their own right, knowledge brokers have their own goals and incentives, which complicate the effects of their presence at the science–policy interface.We illustrate this in an agent-based model and suggest several avenues for further exploration of the role of knowledge brokers in evidence-based policy.

Philosophy of Science
Griffith University (AU), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), University of Groningen (NL), Murdoch University (AU), University of Konstanz (DE), University of Lagos (NG), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Lincoln University - Pennsylvania (US), ARL – Academy for Territorial Development in the Leibniz Association (DE), Green Solution (Czechia) (CZ), Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagónico (AR), Instituto de Biología Subtropical (AR), Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NG), University of Missouri (US), Academia Sinica (TW), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
National Science Foundation, University of Missouri, University of Pittsburgh, Volkswagen Foundation, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universität Bielefeld, Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Forschung, Universität Bielefeld
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.