Virtual Reality as a Preparatory Educational Tool in Non-VR Trauma Simulation for Medical Students: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Abstract Background Simulation-based medical education (SMBE) is a well-established and effective method for clinical training, yet its implementation is often resource-intensive and logistically demanding. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising educational tool, offering immersive, multisensory simulations that may support both procedural and cognitive skill development. In educational context where students must prepare for complex scenarios, VR may serve as a preparatory educational tool. Thus, exploring such simulation formats is well justified to enhance training outcomes. Aim To explore medical students’ experiences of using VR as preparation for a subsequent non-VR trauma simulation. Methods Thirty-two medical students in their seventh semester who were assigned to use a VR application prior to a scheduled non-VR trauma simulation, participated in this study. Eight focus-group interviews were conducted immediately after the trauma simulation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The findings were categorised into four categories: Perceived educational effect , Practical user experience , Comparison of VR and other educational forms , and Areas for improvement in the VR application . The students described the VR application as an engaging and motivating learning method that supported autonomous preparation. However, the VR application was not perceived as sufficient to replace traditional educational formats. Key limitations included low interactivity, limited realism, and lack of cognitive flexibility. The participants proposed improvements, such as dynamic patient responses, expanded roles, and increased complexity in order to better reflect clinical practice. Conclusions The VR application shows potential as a flexible and accessible preparatory complement to SMBE. However, in its current form, it was not perceived as a suitable standalone learning method. The identified limitations relate to the design and scope of the specific VR application studied rather than to inherent limitations of VR technology. Student perspectives offer important insights into how preparatory VR may support motivation, early cognitive rehearsal and familiarization with simulation workflows, and should be actively considered in the development of VR-based educational tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02822-4
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Reality as a Preparatory Educational Tool in Non-VR Trauma Simulation for Medical Students: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Markku M. Haapamäki, Karin Jönsson, Lina Gyllencreutz, M. Byström
Medical Science Educator
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Virtual Reality as a Preparatory Educational Tool in Non-VR Trauma Simulation for Medical Students: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Markku M. Haapamäki, Karin Jönsson, Lina Gyllencreutz, M. Byström
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Simulation-based medical education (SMBE) is a well-established and effective method for clinical training, yet its implementation is often resource-intensive and logistically demanding. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising educational tool, offering immersive, multisensory simulations that may support both procedural and cognitive skill development. In educational context where students must prepare for complex scenarios, VR may serve as a preparatory educational tool. Thus, exploring such simulation formats is well justified to enhance training outcomes. Aim To explore medical students’ experiences of using VR as preparation for a subsequent non-VR trauma simulation. Methods Thirty-two medical students in their seventh semester who were assigned to use a VR application prior to a scheduled non-VR trauma simulation, participated in this study. Eight focus-group interviews were conducted immediately after the trauma simulation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The findings were categorised into four categories: Perceived educational effect , Practical user experience , Comparison of VR and other educational forms , and Areas for improvement in the VR application . The students described the VR application as an engaging and motivating learning method that supported autonomous preparation. However, the VR application was not perceived as sufficient to replace traditional educational formats. Key limitations included low interactivity, limited realism, and lack of cognitive flexibility. The participants proposed improvements, such as dynamic patient responses, expanded roles, and increased complexity in order to better reflect clinical practice. Conclusions The VR application shows potential as a flexible and accessible preparatory complement to SMBE. However, in its current form, it was not perceived as a suitable standalone learning method. The identified limitations relate to the design and scope of the specific VR application studied rather than to inherent limitations of VR technology. Student perspectives offer important insights into how preparatory VR may support motivation, early cognitive rehearsal and familiarization with simulation workflows, and should be actively considered in the development of VR-based educational tools.

Medical Science Educator
Umeå University (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.