High Quality and Poor Quality in Machine Learning for Building Energy Prediction: A Review

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly shifting toward data-centric artificial intelligence approaches. In building energy prediction, a data-centric ML approach is essential for achieving reliable and accurate load forecasting. Despite significant advances in algorithmic approaches, data quality remains underexplored, particularly in interdisciplinary research integrating computer science and building energy studies. Unlike generic universal data quality frameworks, this review systematically examines data quality issues in ML-based building energy prediction and refines intrinsic data quality attributes customized for building energy forecasting and AI modeling. Through bibliometric analysis and a structured literature review, this study establishes two conceptual frameworks that distinguish the core dimensions of high- and poor-quality data. Further, a proprietary paired dual framework implements closed-loop data quality benchmarking and defect diagnosis, a key limitation of existing evaluation architectures. Additionally, a three-stage data processing paradigm provides conceptual insights for data handling in building energy applications. The findings reveal a significant research gap concerning data quality in building energy prediction and highlight the need for more integrated, domain-aware approaches to data curation and model training. This review provides researchers and practitioners with methodological references for selecting appropriate strategies to improve data quality, thereby enhancing the robustness and accuracy of ML-based building energy forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147275
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Quality and Poor Quality in Machine Learning for Building Energy Prediction: A Review

Sung Hyup Hong, Chuyi Luo, Kexin Zhao
Sustainability
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

High Quality and Poor Quality in Machine Learning for Building Energy Prediction: A Review

Sung Hyup Hong, Chuyi Luo, Kexin Zhao
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly shifting toward data-centric artificial intelligence approaches. In building energy prediction, a data-centric ML approach is essential for achieving reliable and accurate load forecasting. Despite significant advances in algorithmic approaches, data quality remains underexplored, particularly in interdisciplinary research integrating computer science and building energy studies. Unlike generic universal data quality frameworks, this review systematically examines data quality issues in ML-based building energy prediction and refines intrinsic data quality attributes customized for building energy forecasting and AI modeling. Through bibliometric analysis and a structured literature review, this study establishes two conceptual frameworks that distinguish the core dimensions of high- and poor-quality data. Further, a proprietary paired dual framework implements closed-loop data quality benchmarking and defect diagnosis, a key limitation of existing evaluation architectures. Additionally, a three-stage data processing paradigm provides conceptual insights for data handling in building energy applications. The findings reveal a significant research gap concerning data quality in building energy prediction and highlight the need for more integrated, domain-aware approaches to data curation and model training. This review provides researchers and practitioners with methodological references for selecting appropriate strategies to improve data quality, thereby enhancing the robustness and accuracy of ML-based building energy forecasting.

SustainabilityVol. 18(14)
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.