Physics-constrained machine-learning surrogates for the colebrook friction factor: monotonic gradient boosting, uncertainty quantification, and open benchmarking

The Darcy-Weisbach friction factor is used to determine the head losses occurring due to friction in pressurised pipes. It is defined by the Colebrook-White Equation as an implicit function of the Reynolds number and relative roughness for which iterative methods are generally required. Explicitly derived approximations can be obtained very quickly but have parameter dependent errors, do not guarantee monotonicity, and give no indication of the level of uncertainty associated with these approximations. Most existing Machine Learning Surrogate models produce accurate representations but rarely constrain their predictions to enforce physically meaningful monotonic relationships, nor provide probabilistic estimates of their reliability. This paper develops a Monotonic Gradient Boosting (MGB) surrogate model that constrains its predictions based on physics-based monotonic relationships and provides both calibrated error bound approximations using quantile boosting and split conformal prediction methods as well as a transparent benchmarking protocol. On the fixed [Formula: see text] evaluation grid, rough-pipe subset ([Formula: see text], 144 cases), the surrogate achieved MAPE = 0.168% and maximum absolute error = [Formula: see text]; on the stratified held-out test set it achieved MAPE = 0.25%. The empirical coverage for nominal 95% prediction intervals was 95.5%. There were no violations to monotonicity across all 1,829 Reynolds number and 1800 relative roughness changes. The explicit baseline models achieved an average absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.236% (Haaland), 0.546% (Swamee-Jain), and 0.012% (Serghides). While Serghides is still superior in terms of point accuracy than the others, the MGB provides both monotonicity constraints and calibration bounds on approximation errors to provide a reliability certificate that cannot be found using any closed form expressions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62231-w
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-constrained machine-learning surrogates for the colebrook friction factor: monotonic gradient boosting, uncertainty quantification, and open benchmarking

Tevfik Denizhan Müftüoğlu
Scientific Reports
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Physics-constrained machine-learning surrogates for the colebrook friction factor: monotonic gradient boosting, uncertainty quantification, and open benchmarking

Tevfik Denizhan Müftüoğlu
article en

Abstract

The Darcy-Weisbach friction factor is used to determine the head losses occurring due to friction in pressurised pipes. It is defined by the Colebrook-White Equation as an implicit function of the Reynolds number and relative roughness for which iterative methods are generally required. Explicitly derived approximations can be obtained very quickly but have parameter dependent errors, do not guarantee monotonicity, and give no indication of the level of uncertainty associated with these approximations. Most existing Machine Learning Surrogate models produce accurate representations but rarely constrain their predictions to enforce physically meaningful monotonic relationships, nor provide probabilistic estimates of their reliability. This paper develops a Monotonic Gradient Boosting (MGB) surrogate model that constrains its predictions based on physics-based monotonic relationships and provides both calibrated error bound approximations using quantile boosting and split conformal prediction methods as well as a transparent benchmarking protocol. On the fixed [Formula: see text] evaluation grid, rough-pipe subset ([Formula: see text], 144 cases), the surrogate achieved MAPE = 0.168% and maximum absolute error = [Formula: see text]; on the stratified held-out test set it achieved MAPE = 0.25%. The empirical coverage for nominal 95% prediction intervals was 95.5%. There were no violations to monotonicity across all 1,829 Reynolds number and 1800 relative roughness changes. The explicit baseline models achieved an average absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.236% (Haaland), 0.546% (Swamee-Jain), and 0.012% (Serghides). While Serghides is still superior in terms of point accuracy than the others, the MGB provides both monotonicity constraints and calibration bounds on approximation errors to provide a reliability certificate that cannot be found using any closed form expressions.

Scientific Reports
Istanbul Aydın University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.