How many parties are enough? The changing structure of Australian political attitudes

This paper examines whether Australia's majoritarian electoral system remains fit for purpose, given declining major-party support. It tests the “fragmentation hypothesis” - that new political cleavages have emerged which existing parties cannot resolve - against the alternative that voters have simply dealigned in protest. Using k-means clustering on Australian Election Study data from 1998 to 2025, the paper inductively maps political and social attitude groups at each federal election. It finds no evidence that the electorate has become more fragmented. Instead, substantial realignment has occurred: the Liberal-voting professional-class base has declined, and the conservative right has split into two issue-based groups, one clustering on social issues and one on economic issues. Without electoral system change or internal party reforms, the major party duopoly will continue struggling to breach these cleavages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Political Science
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2026.2704794
Primary Topic
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How many parties are enough? The changing structure of Australian political attitudes

Jill Sheppard
Australian Journal of Political Science
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
article

How many parties are enough? The changing structure of Australian political attitudes

Jill Sheppard
article en

Abstract

This paper examines whether Australia's majoritarian electoral system remains fit for purpose, given declining major-party support. It tests the “fragmentation hypothesis” - that new political cleavages have emerged which existing parties cannot resolve - against the alternative that voters have simply dealigned in protest. Using k-means clustering on Australian Election Study data from 1998 to 2025, the paper inductively maps political and social attitude groups at each federal election. It finds no evidence that the electorate has become more fragmented. Instead, substantial realignment has occurred: the Liberal-voting professional-class base has declined, and the conservative right has split into two issue-based groups, one clustering on social issues and one on economic issues. Without electoral system change or internal party reforms, the major party duopoly will continue struggling to breach these cleavages.

Australian Journal of Political Science
Australian National University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.