Evaluation of skin dose robustness in breast radiotherapy using VMAT planning technique: a phantom-based surface dosimetry study

OBJECTIVE: Minor anatomical changes from evolving edema during breast radiotherapy can compromise skin dose, particularly for VMAT. This study experimentally evaluated the robustness of conventional, skin-flash, and robust-optimization-based VMAT techniques against simulated contour variations using phantom-based surface dosimetry. 
Approach: Two configurations of an anthropomorphic phantom simulated clinical scenarios: with a breast attachment (large/reconstructed) and without (small/postmastectomy flat chest wall). Four plans were compared: 3D-CRT, conventional VMAT, VMAT with skin-flash, and VMAT with robust optimization. Plan robustness was assessed via TPS simulations and physical OSLD measurements at five surface points. To simulate controlled rigid surface contour change, the couch was shifted anterior-posteriorly by ±2, ±4, and ±6 mm as a simplified surrogate for edema-induced variations. Shifted OSLD measurements were normalized to the 0-mm baseline, and absolute dose deviations were evaluated against the 3D-CRT reference. 
Main results: TPS simulations suggested VMAT with skin-flash offered the greatest stability; however, physical measurements showed the opposite. Conventional VMAT was more variable than 3D-CRT (SD 9.47% vs 3.62% at ±6 mm), and the evaluated VMAT with skin-flash implementation was the least robust (SD 12.60%; worst-case minimum dose 62.49% with 75% of points outside ±5%), despite its favorable TPS prediction. In contrast, VMAT with robust optimization approached the stability of 3D-CRT (SD 5.48%) and showed even smaller deviations than 3D-CRT in the phantom with a breast attachment. 
Significant: These physical measurements demonstrate that, contrary to TPS predictions, the evaluated VMAT with skin-flash implementation does not ensure skin-dose robustness, whereas VMAT with robust optimization substantially improved robustness to a level comparable to that of 3D-CRT, with the greatest benefit observed in the phantom with a breast attachment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae8ca5
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of skin dose robustness in breast radiotherapy using VMAT planning technique: a phantom-based surface dosimetry study

D I Kim, Ryeong Hwang Park, S Park, Hojin Kim et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Evaluation of skin dose robustness in breast radiotherapy using VMAT planning technique: a phantom-based surface dosimetry study

D I Kim, Ryeong Hwang Park, S Park, Hojin Kim, Seo Hee Choi, Do Hyeon Yoo, Hoyeon Jeong, Chae‐Seon Hong, Jee Suk Chang, Woo Shik Kim, YunJoong Kim
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minor anatomical changes from evolving edema during breast radiotherapy can compromise skin dose, particularly for VMAT. This study experimentally evaluated the robustness of conventional, skin-flash, and robust-optimization-based VMAT techniques against simulated contour variations using phantom-based surface dosimetry. 
Approach: Two configurations of an anthropomorphic phantom simulated clinical scenarios: with a breast attachment (large/reconstructed) and without (small/postmastectomy flat chest wall). Four plans were compared: 3D-CRT, conventional VMAT, VMAT with skin-flash, and VMAT with robust optimization. Plan robustness was assessed via TPS simulations and physical OSLD measurements at five surface points. To simulate controlled rigid surface contour change, the couch was shifted anterior-posteriorly by ±2, ±4, and ±6 mm as a simplified surrogate for edema-induced variations. Shifted OSLD measurements were normalized to the 0-mm baseline, and absolute dose deviations were evaluated against the 3D-CRT reference. 
Main results: TPS simulations suggested VMAT with skin-flash offered the greatest stability; however, physical measurements showed the opposite. Conventional VMAT was more variable than 3D-CRT (SD 9.47% vs 3.62% at ±6 mm), and the evaluated VMAT with skin-flash implementation was the least robust (SD 12.60%; worst-case minimum dose 62.49% with 75% of points outside ±5%), despite its favorable TPS prediction. In contrast, VMAT with robust optimization approached the stability of 3D-CRT (SD 5.48%) and showed even smaller deviations than 3D-CRT in the phantom with a breast attachment. 
Significant: These physical measurements demonstrate that, contrary to TPS predictions, the evaluated VMAT with skin-flash implementation does not ensure skin-dose robustness, whereas VMAT with robust optimization substantially improved robustness to a level comparable to that of 3D-CRT, with the greatest benefit observed in the phantom with a breast attachment.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
Yonsei University (KR), Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
National Research Foundation of Korea
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.