Getting In but Not Getting On: Inequality Regimes, Usurpation and Resistance in the Medical Profession

This article explores inequality regimes in medicine, examining structures that create social closure and explaining the under-representation of women from racio-ethnic minorities at senior levels and in high-status specialties. We juxtapose these with agency to evidence how inequality regimes are experienced and navigated through accommodatory usurpation and everyday resistance. Drawing on 26 interviews with women of varying racio-ethnic backgrounds, the findings illustrate deeply embedded inequality regimes that maintain White, male norms; individual agency did not change these regimes, meaning women could progress only where they could comply with them. We contribute to the understanding of inequality in medicine, where women’s experiences remain under-researched. We also contribute to inequalities theory and the understanding of change by offering a rare juxtaposition of structural inequality with individual agency to evidence the latter’s limitations. We argue that collective agency is needed to create radical change and enable women’s progression. Practically, we argue for collective organisational change driven, potentially, by coalition building.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work Employment and Society
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170261447211
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting In but Not Getting On: Inequality Regimes, Usurpation and Resistance in the Medical Profession

Carol A. Atkinson, Carol Woodhams
Work Employment and Society
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Getting In but Not Getting On: Inequality Regimes, Usurpation and Resistance in the Medical Profession

Carol A. Atkinson, Carol Woodhams
article en

Abstract

This article explores inequality regimes in medicine, examining structures that create social closure and explaining the under-representation of women from racio-ethnic minorities at senior levels and in high-status specialties. We juxtapose these with agency to evidence how inequality regimes are experienced and navigated through accommodatory usurpation and everyday resistance. Drawing on 26 interviews with women of varying racio-ethnic backgrounds, the findings illustrate deeply embedded inequality regimes that maintain White, male norms; individual agency did not change these regimes, meaning women could progress only where they could comply with them. We contribute to the understanding of inequality in medicine, where women’s experiences remain under-researched. We also contribute to inequalities theory and the understanding of change by offering a rare juxtaposition of structural inequality with individual agency to evidence the latter’s limitations. We argue that collective agency is needed to create radical change and enable women’s progression. Practically, we argue for collective organisational change driven, potentially, by coalition building.

Work Employment and Society
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Surrey (GB)
Department of Health and Social Care
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.