Impact of comorbidities on endobronchial valve treatment response in severe emphysema patients

Background and objective Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy is an established intervention for patients with advanced emphysema with lung hyperinflation, improving pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Although comorbidities are highly prevalent in this patient population, their effect on EBV treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of comorbidities on clinical EBV treatment response in routine clinical practice. Methods Baseline and 12-month follow-up data were extracted from a prospective registry of EBV procedures conducted between 2016 and 2023. Comorbidities were self-reported via a questionnaire and validated with medical records. Patients were stratified by comorbidity burden: <3 and ≥ 3 comorbidities. Between-group comparisons included relative changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), residual volume (RV), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), safety outcomes, and patient-reported satisfaction. Results In total, 202 patients were included of whom 103 (51%) had ≥3 (range 3–7) comorbidities. Both comorbidity groups demonstrated significant improvements in FEV 1 , RV, 6MWD, and SGRQ at 12 months following EBV treatment, with no significant differences between groups. Notably, patients with a higher comorbidity burden did not show a higher rate of adverse events. Additionally, both groups reported similarly high levels of satisfaction with treatment outcomes, with more than three quarter of patients expressing satisfaction. Conclusions Our results show that EBV treatment provided similar favourable clinical improvements with comparable safety profiles, regardless of patients their comorbidity burden. These findings underscore the importance of considering patients with comorbidities for EBV evaluation and referral.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Medicine
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2026.109046
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of comorbidities on endobronchial valve treatment response in severe emphysema patients

Marlies van Dijk, Jorine E. Hartman, Dirk‐Jan Slebos, Karin Klooster et al.
Respiratory Medicine
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Impact of comorbidities on endobronchial valve treatment response in severe emphysema patients

Marlies van Dijk, Jorine E. Hartman, Dirk‐Jan Slebos, Karin Klooster, Sonja W.S. Augustijn, Else A.M.D. ter Haar, T. David Koster
article en

Abstract

Background and objective Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy is an established intervention for patients with advanced emphysema with lung hyperinflation, improving pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Although comorbidities are highly prevalent in this patient population, their effect on EBV treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of comorbidities on clinical EBV treatment response in routine clinical practice. Methods Baseline and 12-month follow-up data were extracted from a prospective registry of EBV procedures conducted between 2016 and 2023. Comorbidities were self-reported via a questionnaire and validated with medical records. Patients were stratified by comorbidity burden: <3 and ≥ 3 comorbidities. Between-group comparisons included relative changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), residual volume (RV), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), safety outcomes, and patient-reported satisfaction. Results In total, 202 patients were included of whom 103 (51%) had ≥3 (range 3–7) comorbidities. Both comorbidity groups demonstrated significant improvements in FEV 1 , RV, 6MWD, and SGRQ at 12 months following EBV treatment, with no significant differences between groups. Notably, patients with a higher comorbidity burden did not show a higher rate of adverse events. Additionally, both groups reported similarly high levels of satisfaction with treatment outcomes, with more than three quarter of patients expressing satisfaction. Conclusions Our results show that EBV treatment provided similar favourable clinical improvements with comparable safety profiles, regardless of patients their comorbidity burden. These findings underscore the importance of considering patients with comorbidities for EBV evaluation and referral.

Respiratory MedicineVol. 261
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.