Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality

This paper employs sensemaking theory to examine the relationships between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and the quality of decision-making in information technology firms. Additionally, this study operationalized sensemaking processes as a mediator in the above mentioned relationships. The study employed a three-time lag approach with a 45-day gap, utilizing data from 348 managers, supervisors, and leaders. Partial least squares structural equation modeling and SmartPLS 4 are employed for the analyses. The results indicate that rationalized knowledge-hiding and communication patterns have a significant impact on decision-making quality. Moreover, sensemaking processes partially/complementary mediate the relationship between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and decision-making quality. Incorporating sensemaking processes into the study model provides deeper insight into managers' decisions and maps the temporal nature of these relationships. These valuable findings shed light on new meanings and directions for theoretical perspectives and their relevance in management and organizational behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353567
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality

Sadia Shaheen, Muhammad Waseem Bari, Zhihao Gao
PLoS ONE
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality

Sadia Shaheen, Muhammad Waseem Bari, Zhihao Gao
article en

Abstract

This paper employs sensemaking theory to examine the relationships between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and the quality of decision-making in information technology firms. Additionally, this study operationalized sensemaking processes as a mediator in the above mentioned relationships. The study employed a three-time lag approach with a 45-day gap, utilizing data from 348 managers, supervisors, and leaders. Partial least squares structural equation modeling and SmartPLS 4 are employed for the analyses. The results indicate that rationalized knowledge-hiding and communication patterns have a significant impact on decision-making quality. Moreover, sensemaking processes partially/complementary mediate the relationship between rationalized knowledge hiding, communication patterns, and decision-making quality. Incorporating sensemaking processes into the study model provides deeper insight into managers' decisions and maps the temporal nature of these relationships. These valuable findings shed light on new meanings and directions for theoretical perspectives and their relevance in management and organizational behavior.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Quanzhou Normal University (CN), Government College University, Faisalabad (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sensemaking at work: How rationalized knowledge hiding and communication patterns affect decision quality — Sadia Shaheen, Muhammad Waseem Bari, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS