Afterword: Exploring the Intersections between the Green and Digital Transitions

Abstract This afterword examines the intersections between the green and digital transitions within EU law and argues for the development of a coherent regulatory framework capable of addressing their interdependence. Drawing on the contributions to the special issue, it identifies a number of common challenges, including tensions between market structures and the protection of fundamental rights, the environment and the climate, the limits of anthropocentric approaches to regulation and the increasing relevance of interdisciplinary expertise in law-making and adjudication. The paper further distinguishes between two forms of conflict arising from the twin transitions: normative conflicts between overlapping regulatory regimes and substantive conflicts concerning the negative consequences of one transition on the other. To address these issues, the afterword proposes a “pointillist” approach grounded in the coordinated and teleological interpretation of EU law. Finally, it suggests that impact assessment regimes provide a particularly promising case study for future research on theintersections between the twin transitions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10116
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Afterword: Exploring the Intersections between the Green and Digital Transitions

Chiara Angiolini
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Environmental law and policy
article

Afterword: Exploring the Intersections between the Green and Digital Transitions

Chiara Angiolini
article en

Abstract

Abstract This afterword examines the intersections between the green and digital transitions within EU law and argues for the development of a coherent regulatory framework capable of addressing their interdependence. Drawing on the contributions to the special issue, it identifies a number of common challenges, including tensions between market structures and the protection of fundamental rights, the environment and the climate, the limits of anthropocentric approaches to regulation and the increasing relevance of interdisciplinary expertise in law-making and adjudication. The paper further distinguishes between two forms of conflict arising from the twin transitions: normative conflicts between overlapping regulatory regimes and substantive conflicts concerning the negative consequences of one transition on the other. To address these issues, the afterword proposes a “pointillist” approach grounded in the coordinated and teleological interpretation of EU law. Finally, it suggests that impact assessment regimes provide a particularly promising case study for future research on theintersections between the twin transitions.

European Journal of Risk Regulation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Afterword: Exploring the Intersections between the Green and Digital Transitions — Chiara Angiolini · European Journal of Risk Regulation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS