Multiracial perspectives on ethnoracial categorization in Alzheimer's disease research

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is a growing proportion of Alzheimer's disease (AD) research participants identifying as two or more races; however, analyses primarily rely on monoracial categories, resulting in exclusion or recategorization of Multiracial participants. METHODS We conducted semi‐structured qualitative interviews with 21 Multiracial adults to explore preferences and perceptions of racial categorization and reclassification in AD research. Recruitment prioritized diverse Multiracial identities, and interviews were evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants expressed varied preferences for racial categorization, with many assuming a monoracial standard. Preferences corresponded to both racial identity and assumed racial identification, and depended on available options. Participants responded to reclassification with calls for increased transparency about study methods and intended data usage, and concerns for racial misrepresentation. DISCUSSION Findings underscore the utility of multiple questions and response options for racial categorization, researcher respect of participant experiences and the evolving nature of classification systems, and clear communication about analytic decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsa3.70097
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiracial perspectives on ethnoracial categorization in Alzheimer's disease research

Nanako A Hawley, Stacey Moeller, Marta Meana, Elizabeth Lawrence et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Multiracial perspectives on ethnoracial categorization in Alzheimer's disease research

Nanako A Hawley, Stacey Moeller, Marta Meana, Elizabeth Lawrence, Samantha E. John, Brenna N. Renn
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is a growing proportion of Alzheimer's disease (AD) research participants identifying as two or more races; however, analyses primarily rely on monoracial categories, resulting in exclusion or recategorization of Multiracial participants. METHODS We conducted semi‐structured qualitative interviews with 21 Multiracial adults to explore preferences and perceptions of racial categorization and reclassification in AD research. Recruitment prioritized diverse Multiracial identities, and interviews were evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants expressed varied preferences for racial categorization, with many assuming a monoracial standard. Preferences corresponded to both racial identity and assumed racial identification, and depended on available options. Participants responded to reclassification with calls for increased transparency about study methods and intended data usage, and concerns for racial misrepresentation. DISCUSSION Findings underscore the utility of multiple questions and response options for racial categorization, researcher respect of participant experiences and the evolving nature of classification systems, and clear communication about analytic decisions.

Alzheimer s & Dementia Behavior & Socioeconomics of AgingVol. 2(3)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.