‘A deep aversion to democracy’: the British Army and the authoritarian perspective on Northern Ireland

This article identifies an Authoritarian theory for explaining the British state's approach to Northern Ireland, which emphasises the importance of repression, rather than conciliation, in managing conflict. Authoritarians, drawing on Neorealism and Strategic Theory, assume that the state is a ‘Single Rational Actor'. Paradoxically, although Authoritarians identify as ‘Strategists' or ‘Military Historians' – with close links to the military – their ‘Single Rational Actor' approach ignores and thereby conceals, the British Army's and the Security State's powerful, conservative-authoritarian and undemocratic political influence. Authoritarians' theoretical-ideological assertions leave them unable to resolve the tension between their crude strategic rationalist assumptions and the complexity and nuance of historical evidence. Consequently, there is a contradiction between, first, the assertion of unity in political-military relations. Second, the assertion that it was the Army that saved the nation, and was ‘learning, adapting and winning' the war. And third, strong evidence of intense political-military conflict leading to a British State Crisis and Army Emergency. Authoritarian theory is unconvincing, mistaking their view that the state should act as a ‘Single Rational Actor' for the claim that the state did act as a ‘Single Rational Actor’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irish Political Studies
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2026.2680020
Primary Topic
Irish and British Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘A deep aversion to democracy’: the British Army and the authoritarian perspective on Northern Ireland

Paul Dixon
Irish Political Studies
Irish and British Studies
article

‘A deep aversion to democracy’: the British Army and the authoritarian perspective on Northern Ireland

Paul Dixon
article en

Abstract

This article identifies an Authoritarian theory for explaining the British state's approach to Northern Ireland, which emphasises the importance of repression, rather than conciliation, in managing conflict. Authoritarians, drawing on Neorealism and Strategic Theory, assume that the state is a ‘Single Rational Actor'. Paradoxically, although Authoritarians identify as ‘Strategists' or ‘Military Historians' – with close links to the military – their ‘Single Rational Actor' approach ignores and thereby conceals, the British Army's and the Security State's powerful, conservative-authoritarian and undemocratic political influence. Authoritarians' theoretical-ideological assertions leave them unable to resolve the tension between their crude strategic rationalist assumptions and the complexity and nuance of historical evidence. Consequently, there is a contradiction between, first, the assertion of unity in political-military relations. Second, the assertion that it was the Army that saved the nation, and was ‘learning, adapting and winning' the war. And third, strong evidence of intense political-military conflict leading to a British State Crisis and Army Emergency. Authoritarian theory is unconvincing, mistaking their view that the state should act as a ‘Single Rational Actor' for the claim that the state did act as a ‘Single Rational Actor’.

Irish Political Studies
University of Leicester (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Irish and British Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.