Ecological Network Optimization in Highly Urbanized Areas: Achieving Connectivity Between Natural and Human Activity Spaces—A Case Study of Guangzhou

The insufficient connectivity between human activity spaces and the natural environment impairs ecosystem connectivity and leads to the gradual compression of the natural environment by human activity spaces. In highly urbanized areas, human activity spaces and natural environments are often disconnected, yet few existing ecological network studies have actively incorporated human activity spaces into the an optimization framework to promote their integration with natural ecosystems. Taking Guangzhou as a case study, this research integrates MSPA-InVEST (the Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis—Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model), landscape connectivity assessment, the MCR model (Minimum Cumulative Resistance model), and the gravity model to identify ecological sources and potential corridors. It innovatively introduces enterprise kernel density to add planned sources and planned corridors, thereby developing an ecological network optimization scheme that achieves spatial integration between human activity spaces and the natural environment. The results identified 38 ecological sources (total area ~2907.65 km2, accounting for 39.07% of the study area) and 46 basic ecological corridors, showing a spatial pattern of “dense in the north, sparse in the central-south”. The addition of 7 planned sources and 22 planned corridors increased the network’s closure, connectivity, and linkage rate by 115.38%, 24.79%, and 23.26%, respectively, with the overall connectivity reaching 0.53. The spatial pattern shifted from an uneven distribution to a “north–south linkage and full coverage” layout. The optimized ecological network effectively connects the major ecological source areas in Guangzhou and, in combination with natural corridors such as rivers, forms a comprehensive ecological security pattern of “mountains–water–forests–city”, thereby constructing a comprehensive ecological network framework for highly urbanized areas. This method takes into account both ecological integrity and economic spatial demands, providing a scientific reference for the construction of ecological networks and the optimization of territorial space in high-density megacities, with the ultimate goal of integrating human activity spaces with natural ecosystems and fostering sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147284
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological Network Optimization in Highly Urbanized Areas: Achieving Connectivity Between Natural and Human Activity Spaces—A Case Study of Guangzhou

Z Y Li, Gengyuan Liu, Yue Wang
Sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Ecological Network Optimization in Highly Urbanized Areas: Achieving Connectivity Between Natural and Human Activity Spaces—A Case Study of Guangzhou

Z Y Li, Gengyuan Liu, Yue Wang
article en

Abstract

The insufficient connectivity between human activity spaces and the natural environment impairs ecosystem connectivity and leads to the gradual compression of the natural environment by human activity spaces. In highly urbanized areas, human activity spaces and natural environments are often disconnected, yet few existing ecological network studies have actively incorporated human activity spaces into the an optimization framework to promote their integration with natural ecosystems. Taking Guangzhou as a case study, this research integrates MSPA-InVEST (the Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis—Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model), landscape connectivity assessment, the MCR model (Minimum Cumulative Resistance model), and the gravity model to identify ecological sources and potential corridors. It innovatively introduces enterprise kernel density to add planned sources and planned corridors, thereby developing an ecological network optimization scheme that achieves spatial integration between human activity spaces and the natural environment. The results identified 38 ecological sources (total area ~2907.65 km2, accounting for 39.07% of the study area) and 46 basic ecological corridors, showing a spatial pattern of “dense in the north, sparse in the central-south”. The addition of 7 planned sources and 22 planned corridors increased the network’s closure, connectivity, and linkage rate by 115.38%, 24.79%, and 23.26%, respectively, with the overall connectivity reaching 0.53. The spatial pattern shifted from an uneven distribution to a “north–south linkage and full coverage” layout. The optimized ecological network effectively connects the major ecological source areas in Guangzhou and, in combination with natural corridors such as rivers, forms a comprehensive ecological security pattern of “mountains–water–forests–city”, thereby constructing a comprehensive ecological network framework for highly urbanized areas. This method takes into account both ecological integrity and economic spatial demands, providing a scientific reference for the construction of ecological networks and the optimization of territorial space in high-density megacities, with the ultimate goal of integrating human activity spaces with natural ecosystems and fostering sustainable development.

SustainabilityVol. 18(14)
Guangdong University of Technology (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.