Comparative Assessment of Landsat‐8 and SPOT‐7 Satellite Data With Field Spectral Measurements for Estimating Plant Diversity in Sandy Grasslands

ABSTRACT Remote sensing provides an efficient approach for biodiversity monitoring, yet the relative performance of different data sources in dryland sandy ecosystems is still poorly understood. In this study, we compared Landsat‐8 OLI, SPOT, and hyperspectral data for estimating vascular plant diversity in the Hunshandak Sandland, northern China. Field surveys were conducted in July–August 2016 using 1 m × 1 m plots across four habitat types. Alpha and beta diversity were calculated from field observations, whereas spectral bands, vegetation indices, and texture metrics were extracted from imagery acquired during the growing season. Spearman correlation analysis was used to identify spectral variables associated with plant diversity and compare their performance among sensors. SPOT showed the strongest relationships with alpha diversity, hyperspectral data showed intermediate performance, and Landsat performed relatively poorly. Red‐edge variables and high‐resolution texture metrics were particularly informative. Beta diversity varied among habitats and was mainly driven by species turnover. The weaker performance of Landsat was likely related to mixed‐pixel effects caused by its coarse spatial resolution. These results highlight the importance of spatial resolution and red‐edge information for biodiversity assessment in sandy grasslands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Diversity
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bod2.70031
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Landsat‐8 and SPOT‐7 Satellite Data With Field Spectral Measurements for Estimating Plant Diversity in Sandy Grasslands

Xiaoyue Zhang, Yu Peng, Jianxiong Lan, Ying Ye
Biological Diversity
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Comparative Assessment of Landsat‐8 and SPOT‐7 Satellite Data With Field Spectral Measurements for Estimating Plant Diversity in Sandy Grasslands

Xiaoyue Zhang, Yu Peng, Jianxiong Lan, Ying Ye
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Remote sensing provides an efficient approach for biodiversity monitoring, yet the relative performance of different data sources in dryland sandy ecosystems is still poorly understood. In this study, we compared Landsat‐8 OLI, SPOT, and hyperspectral data for estimating vascular plant diversity in the Hunshandak Sandland, northern China. Field surveys were conducted in July–August 2016 using 1 m × 1 m plots across four habitat types. Alpha and beta diversity were calculated from field observations, whereas spectral bands, vegetation indices, and texture metrics were extracted from imagery acquired during the growing season. Spearman correlation analysis was used to identify spectral variables associated with plant diversity and compare their performance among sensors. SPOT showed the strongest relationships with alpha diversity, hyperspectral data showed intermediate performance, and Landsat performed relatively poorly. Red‐edge variables and high‐resolution texture metrics were particularly informative. Beta diversity varied among habitats and was mainly driven by species turnover. The weaker performance of Landsat was likely related to mixed‐pixel effects caused by its coarse spatial resolution. These results highlight the importance of spatial resolution and red‐edge information for biodiversity assessment in sandy grasslands.

Biological Diversity
Minzu University of China (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.