Impact of screening all high-risk patients at hospital admission for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in Spain: a cost-consequence analysis

Aim Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization by culture-based or molecular-based methods in hospitals identifies patients for decolonization, mitigating transmission. This study aimed at quantifying the impact of expanding MRSA screening at hospital admission in Spain to all patients at high risk of being colonized with MRSA (HRP), using on-demand molecular PCR instead of culture.Methods In the base case, HRP were those admitted to coronary, burn, or hemodialysis units, hematology or oncology medical departments, intensive care units (ICU) or specified surgical departments. A decision-tree model was developed to compare MRSA screening strategies: S1 was preventive contact precautions (PrevCP) + screening with on-demand molecular PCR (Xpert MRSA NxGFootnotei) applied to all HRP; S2 was PrevCP + culture-based screening applied to all HRP; S3 was current clinical practice in Spain of PrevCP + culture-based screening for ICU-admitted patients only. A 60-day time horizon was considered, and the hospital perspective was adopted. Model input values were obtained from publicly available data and expert opinion.Results In a hospital with 20,000 annual admissions, S1 versus S2 was estimated to generate 7.4 more MRSA-positive tests, 4.3 more successful decolonizations, and 0.8 fewer MRSA-related infections. The increase in total testing costs (+61,447.4€) was more than compensated by savings in excess cost due to PrevCP (−792,211.0€) and infection-related costs (−18,271.2€). Estimated total cost savings with S1 versus S2 were 748,971.2€ (−438.8€/HRP tested). Screening with S1 versus S3 increased the number of HRP tested (1,524.0), identified 113.3 more MRSA-positive tests, with 12.6 fewer MRSA-related infections, and 3.4 fewer deaths. Estimated total cost savings with S1 versus S3 were 272,118.5€ (−3,278.0€/HRP tested).Conclusion Screening all HRP with Xpert MRSA NxG in Spain compared with culture and current clinical practice could generate savings from a hospital perspective and prevent infections, nosocomial colonization, and mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Economics
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2026.2700422
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of screening all high-risk patients at hospital admission for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: a cost-consequence analysis

Marı́a González-Cuevas, Filipa Aragão, Vicens Díaz-Brito, Carmen Aguilar‐Romero et al.
Journal of Medical Economics
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Impact of screening all high-risk patients at hospital admission for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: a cost-consequence analysis

Marı́a González-Cuevas, Filipa Aragão, Vicens Díaz-Brito, Carmen Aguilar‐Romero, Inmaculada Salcedo
article en

Abstract

Aim Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization by culture-based or molecular-based methods in hospitals identifies patients for decolonization, mitigating transmission. This study aimed at quantifying the impact of expanding MRSA screening at hospital admission in Spain to all patients at high risk of being colonized with MRSA (HRP), using on-demand molecular PCR instead of culture.Methods In the base case, HRP were those admitted to coronary, burn, or hemodialysis units, hematology or oncology medical departments, intensive care units (ICU) or specified surgical departments. A decision-tree model was developed to compare MRSA screening strategies: S1 was preventive contact precautions (PrevCP) + screening with on-demand molecular PCR (Xpert MRSA NxGFootnotei) applied to all HRP; S2 was PrevCP + culture-based screening applied to all HRP; S3 was current clinical practice in Spain of PrevCP + culture-based screening for ICU-admitted patients only. A 60-day time horizon was considered, and the hospital perspective was adopted. Model input values were obtained from publicly available data and expert opinion.Results In a hospital with 20,000 annual admissions, S1 versus S2 was estimated to generate 7.4 more MRSA-positive tests, 4.3 more successful decolonizations, and 0.8 fewer MRSA-related infections. The increase in total testing costs (+61,447.4€) was more than compensated by savings in excess cost due to PrevCP (−792,211.0€) and infection-related costs (−18,271.2€). Estimated total cost savings with S1 versus S2 were 748,971.2€ (−438.8€/HRP tested). Screening with S1 versus S3 increased the number of HRP tested (1,524.0), identified 113.3 more MRSA-positive tests, with 12.6 fewer MRSA-related infections, and 3.4 fewer deaths. Estimated total cost savings with S1 versus S3 were 272,118.5€ (−3,278.0€/HRP tested).Conclusion Screening all HRP with Xpert MRSA NxG in Spain compared with culture and current clinical practice could generate savings from a hospital perspective and prevent infections, nosocomial colonization, and mortality.

Journal of Medical EconomicsVol. 29(1)
ActionAid (US), Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (ES), Research for Action (US), Hospital Alto Guadalquivir (ES), Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.