Space Radiation and Cancer Risk in Astronauts: Models, Evidence, Uncertainties, and Emerging Imaging Perspectives

Cancer risk estimation remains one of the main unresolved challenges in human spaceflight beyond low Earth orbit, where astronauts are exposed to galactic cosmic rays, solar particle events, and high-linear energy transfer (high-LET) secondary radiation. This narrative review summarizes the principal quantitative models used to estimate radiation-induced cancer risk in astronauts, including particle fluence-based cross-sections, mixture models, risk of exposure-induced death (REID)-based operational frameworks, uncertainty distribution approaches, and ensemble models. Early studies estimated 1-year excess cancer mortality at solar minimum as 1.3% in women and 1.1% in men under 10 g/cm2 aluminum shielding, whereas later models projected non-leukemia lifetime cancer incidence after 1 Sv dose equivalent/effective dose between 2.20% and 2.98%, depending on sex and age. Earlier REID-based models suggested that the historical 3% REID threshold could be exceeded after approximately 18 months in women and 24 months in men under unfavorable solar conditions, whereas the current NASA radiation standard uses a universal career-effective dose limit of 600 mSv, applied regardless of sex or age. More recent revisions of the NASA Space Cancer Risk model and non-targeted effect scenarios suggest that exploration mission risks may be higher than previously estimated, while uncertainty remains substantial, especially for high-LET radiobiology, mixed-field exposure, and the transfer of terrestrial epidemiological data to the spaceflight setting. Future progress may also involve exploring quantitative imaging biomarkers and tomographic assessments as complementary tools for longitudinal monitoring and early detection of radiation-related tissue changes, although these approaches are not yet validated as components of operational astronaut cancer risk models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tomography
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12070106
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Space Radiation and Cancer Risk in Astronauts: Models, Evidence, Uncertainties, and Emerging Imaging Perspectives

Emilio Quaia, Amalia Lupi, Filippo Crimì, Michele Basilicata et al.
Tomography
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Space Radiation and Cancer Risk in Astronauts: Models, Evidence, Uncertainties, and Emerging Imaging Perspectives

Emilio Quaia, Amalia Lupi, Filippo Crimì, Michele Basilicata, Chiara Zanon, Agostino Chiaravalloti, Nicola Giannotti
article en

Abstract

Cancer risk estimation remains one of the main unresolved challenges in human spaceflight beyond low Earth orbit, where astronauts are exposed to galactic cosmic rays, solar particle events, and high-linear energy transfer (high-LET) secondary radiation. This narrative review summarizes the principal quantitative models used to estimate radiation-induced cancer risk in astronauts, including particle fluence-based cross-sections, mixture models, risk of exposure-induced death (REID)-based operational frameworks, uncertainty distribution approaches, and ensemble models. Early studies estimated 1-year excess cancer mortality at solar minimum as 1.3% in women and 1.1% in men under 10 g/cm2 aluminum shielding, whereas later models projected non-leukemia lifetime cancer incidence after 1 Sv dose equivalent/effective dose between 2.20% and 2.98%, depending on sex and age. Earlier REID-based models suggested that the historical 3% REID threshold could be exceeded after approximately 18 months in women and 24 months in men under unfavorable solar conditions, whereas the current NASA radiation standard uses a universal career-effective dose limit of 600 mSv, applied regardless of sex or age. More recent revisions of the NASA Space Cancer Risk model and non-targeted effect scenarios suggest that exploration mission risks may be higher than previously estimated, while uncertainty remains substantial, especially for high-LET radiobiology, mixed-field exposure, and the transfer of terrestrial epidemiological data to the spaceflight setting. Future progress may also involve exploring quantitative imaging biomarkers and tomographic assessments as complementary tools for longitudinal monitoring and early detection of radiation-related tissue changes, although these approaches are not yet validated as components of operational astronaut cancer risk models.

TomographyVol. 12(7)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Padua (IT), Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (IT), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.