Causal assessment of 187 dietary habits with ovarian cancer from multiple sources via Mendelian randomization and meta-analysis

Observational studies have suggested that dietary habits may influence ovarian cancer risk, but Mendelian randomization (MR) evidence remains limited. Genetic data for 187 dietary habit phenotypes and ovarian cancer were collected and preprocessed. MR analyses were performed using 2 independent ovarian cancer datasets. Inverse-variance weighted estimates were pooled by meta-analysis, and multiple-testing correction was applied. Reverse MR analyses were conducted for significant dietary phenotypes to assess causal direction. Among the 187 dietary habit phenotypes, only cherry preference (GCST90094731) showed a significant causal association with ovarian cancer risk. In the FinnGen R12 dataset, the inverse-variance weighted estimate was not significant (odds ratio [OR] = 0.902, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.703-1.158; P = .419). In the OpenGWAS dataset, cherry preference was associated with reduced ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.691-0.948; P = .0087). Meta-analysis yielded a combined OR of 0.835 (95% CI: 0.730-0.954; P = .0081), and the association remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Reverse MR analysis showed no evidence of reverse causality. Genetically predicted cherry preference was associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer. These findings provide genetic evidence supporting a potential role of dietary habits in ovarian cancer prevention and may inform precision nutrition and public health strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000049642
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal assessment of 187 dietary habits with ovarian cancer from multiple sources via Mendelian randomization and meta-analysis

Chengying Yu, R U I Y A N Zhang, Zhaifang Ye, Jun Xu
Medicine
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Causal assessment of 187 dietary habits with ovarian cancer from multiple sources via Mendelian randomization and meta-analysis

Chengying Yu, R U I Y A N Zhang, Zhaifang Ye, Jun Xu
article en

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested that dietary habits may influence ovarian cancer risk, but Mendelian randomization (MR) evidence remains limited. Genetic data for 187 dietary habit phenotypes and ovarian cancer were collected and preprocessed. MR analyses were performed using 2 independent ovarian cancer datasets. Inverse-variance weighted estimates were pooled by meta-analysis, and multiple-testing correction was applied. Reverse MR analyses were conducted for significant dietary phenotypes to assess causal direction. Among the 187 dietary habit phenotypes, only cherry preference (GCST90094731) showed a significant causal association with ovarian cancer risk. In the FinnGen R12 dataset, the inverse-variance weighted estimate was not significant (odds ratio [OR] = 0.902, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.703-1.158; P = .419). In the OpenGWAS dataset, cherry preference was associated with reduced ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.691-0.948; P = .0087). Meta-analysis yielded a combined OR of 0.835 (95% CI: 0.730-0.954; P = .0081), and the association remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Reverse MR analysis showed no evidence of reverse causality. Genetically predicted cherry preference was associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer. These findings provide genetic evidence supporting a potential role of dietary habits in ovarian cancer prevention and may inform precision nutrition and public health strategies.

MedicineVol. 105(29)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN), Tongren Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.