The New Eastern Question: Naval power, lawfare, and the struggle for Eurasian dominance

The article develops a comparative historical framework to reinterpret contemporary Eurasian crises as the culmination of a “New” Eastern Question. It argues that the core dynamics of nineteenth-century rivalry between maritime and continental powers—then Britain and Russia, now the United States and Russia—persist under transformed conditions. Using five analytical parameters, it compares the classical Eastern Question (1774–1918) with the post–Cold War period (1991–2026), showing that Eurasia remains the primary strategic theater and that competition over chokepoints, resources, and religious-ideological narratives endures. At the same time, nuclear weapons, globalized interdependence, information technologies, and the weaponization of international law make this New Eastern Question more volatile and dangerous. Applying the framework to the war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East, the article highlights escalation risks and draws implications for Western defense planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Strategy
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2703650
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The New Eastern Question: Naval power, lawfare, and the struggle for Eurasian dominance

Konstantinos Papadimitriou
Comparative Strategy
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

The New Eastern Question: Naval power, lawfare, and the struggle for Eurasian dominance

Konstantinos Papadimitriou
article en

Abstract

The article develops a comparative historical framework to reinterpret contemporary Eurasian crises as the culmination of a “New” Eastern Question. It argues that the core dynamics of nineteenth-century rivalry between maritime and continental powers—then Britain and Russia, now the United States and Russia—persist under transformed conditions. Using five analytical parameters, it compares the classical Eastern Question (1774–1918) with the post–Cold War period (1991–2026), showing that Eurasia remains the primary strategic theater and that competition over chokepoints, resources, and religious-ideological narratives endures. At the same time, nuclear weapons, globalized interdependence, information technologies, and the weaponization of international law make this New Eastern Question more volatile and dangerous. Applying the framework to the war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East, the article highlights escalation risks and draws implications for Western defense planning.

Comparative Strategy
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.