Adsorption of Polyethylene Nanoplastics by Graphene Oxide–Polysaccharide Composites: Kinetic, Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies

With high mobility, long-term durability, and potential risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health, polyethylene nanoplastics (PE–NPs) are a developing environmental issue. Therefore, graphene oxide (GO) was utilized to functionalize chitosan (CS) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) in order to create sustainable polysaccharide-based composites that resulted in graphene oxide–chitosan (GO–CS), graphene oxide–MCC–50 µm and graphene oxide–MCC–90 µm adsorbents in order to evaluate the adsorption performance of sustainable GO–polysaccharide composites toward laboratory-prepared polyethylene nanoplastics under controlled conditions. The novelty of this study lies in the comparative evaluation of GO–chitosan and GO–microcrystalline cellulose composites with two MCC particle sizes (50 μm and 90 μm) for the adsorption of laboratory-prepared polyethylene nanoplastics, providing insight into the influence of adsorbent composition and particle size on adsorption performance. The prepared adsorbents were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), point of zero charge (pHpzc), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) in order to analyze adsorption behavior by morphology, chemical structure, surface chemistry, and particle crystallinity. According to the results, GO–CS has the maximum adsorption capacity (50.25 mg·g−1), followed by GO–MCC–50 µm (38.31 mg·g−1) and GO–MCC–90 µm (27.02 mg·g−1). Smaller MCC particle sizes of adsorbent resulted in improved adsorption performance, as demonstrated by the increased adsorption capacity of GO–MCC–50 µm as opposed to GO–MCC–90 µm. The difference between the graphene oxide–MCC–50 µm and graphene oxide–MCC–90 µm composites’ adsorption capacities demonstrates that adsorption capacity greatly increases with small adsorbent particle sizes. Stronger interaction sites, hydrophobic contacts, and a large number of functional groups are all responsible for the improved performance. The findings provide insight into the influence of polymer type and particle size on polyethylene nanoplastic adsorption and support the further development of GO-based biopolymer adsorbents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microplastics
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5030142
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adsorption of Polyethylene Nanoplastics by Graphene Oxide–Polysaccharide Composites: Kinetic, Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies

Martynas Talaikis, Mahrosh Javed, Audrius Drabavičius, Sergej Šemčuk et al.
Microplastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Adsorption of Polyethylene Nanoplastics by Graphene Oxide–Polysaccharide Composites: Kinetic, Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies

Martynas Talaikis, Mahrosh Javed, Audrius Drabavičius, Sergej Šemčuk, Galina Lujanienė, Aušra Selskienė, Tayyab Tahir, Vidas Pakštas
article en

Abstract

With high mobility, long-term durability, and potential risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health, polyethylene nanoplastics (PE–NPs) are a developing environmental issue. Therefore, graphene oxide (GO) was utilized to functionalize chitosan (CS) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) in order to create sustainable polysaccharide-based composites that resulted in graphene oxide–chitosan (GO–CS), graphene oxide–MCC–50 µm and graphene oxide–MCC–90 µm adsorbents in order to evaluate the adsorption performance of sustainable GO–polysaccharide composites toward laboratory-prepared polyethylene nanoplastics under controlled conditions. The novelty of this study lies in the comparative evaluation of GO–chitosan and GO–microcrystalline cellulose composites with two MCC particle sizes (50 μm and 90 μm) for the adsorption of laboratory-prepared polyethylene nanoplastics, providing insight into the influence of adsorbent composition and particle size on adsorption performance. The prepared adsorbents were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), point of zero charge (pHpzc), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) in order to analyze adsorption behavior by morphology, chemical structure, surface chemistry, and particle crystallinity. According to the results, GO–CS has the maximum adsorption capacity (50.25 mg·g−1), followed by GO–MCC–50 µm (38.31 mg·g−1) and GO–MCC–90 µm (27.02 mg·g−1). Smaller MCC particle sizes of adsorbent resulted in improved adsorption performance, as demonstrated by the increased adsorption capacity of GO–MCC–50 µm as opposed to GO–MCC–90 µm. The difference between the graphene oxide–MCC–50 µm and graphene oxide–MCC–90 µm composites’ adsorption capacities demonstrates that adsorption capacity greatly increases with small adsorbent particle sizes. Stronger interaction sites, hydrophobic contacts, and a large number of functional groups are all responsible for the improved performance. The findings provide insight into the influence of polymer type and particle size on polyethylene nanoplastic adsorption and support the further development of GO-based biopolymer adsorbents.

MicroplasticsVol. 5(3)
Center for Physical Sciences and Technology (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.