Applying Brazilian front-of-pack nutrition labeling and PAHO nutritional criteria to digital food advertising: regulatory implications for protecting children and adolescents

Front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FoPNL) and restrictions on food advertising are regulatory strategies to support informed dietary choices and reduce exposure to unhealthy food. These measures are often integrated through a policy package, that employs a Nutrient Profile Model (NPM) for the classification of food. In Brazil, however, these policies remain fragmented, and current food advertising regulations do not fully cover all channels, particularly digital media. This study applied the NPM adopted in Brazil's FoPNL (RDC No. 429/2020 in conjunction with IN No. 75/2020, hereafter RDC 429) and those proposed by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) for identifying foods subject to advertising restrictions on social media posts directed at children and adolescents. The sample included posts from ultra-processed food brands/products on Instagram (n = 623), TikTok (n = 257), and YouTube (n = 114). Both NPM were applied to assess non-compliance at the food-item level and at the advertisement level (considering posts containing at least one non-compliant food). At the food-item level, 61.28% of products exceeded at least one item of RDC 429, with the highest prevalence on TikTok (72.63%), while 93.86% were non-compliant according to PAHO, reaching 100% on TikTok and 98.5% on YouTube. At the advertisement level, 49.53% of posts contained at least one non-compliant food under RDC 429, and 74.13% under PAHO, with YouTube showing the greatest potential for restriction (62.16% RDC; 99.10% PAHO). Both models are feasible for regulating digital food advertising: the PAHO provides a robust framework, while RDC 429 offers a strategic starting point given its current implementation in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354180
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Brazilian front-of-pack nutrition labeling and PAHO nutritional criteria to digital food advertising: regulatory implications for protecting children and adolescents

Juliana de Paula Matos, Paula Martins Horta, Laís Amaral Mais, Breenda Lorranny Santos Gonçalves Araújo et al.
PLoS ONE
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Applying Brazilian front-of-pack nutrition labeling and PAHO nutritional criteria to digital food advertising: regulatory implications for protecting children and adolescents

Juliana de Paula Matos, Paula Martins Horta, Laís Amaral Mais, Breenda Lorranny Santos Gonçalves Araújo, Mariana Ribeiro
article en

Abstract

Front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FoPNL) and restrictions on food advertising are regulatory strategies to support informed dietary choices and reduce exposure to unhealthy food. These measures are often integrated through a policy package, that employs a Nutrient Profile Model (NPM) for the classification of food. In Brazil, however, these policies remain fragmented, and current food advertising regulations do not fully cover all channels, particularly digital media. This study applied the NPM adopted in Brazil's FoPNL (RDC No. 429/2020 in conjunction with IN No. 75/2020, hereafter RDC 429) and those proposed by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) for identifying foods subject to advertising restrictions on social media posts directed at children and adolescents. The sample included posts from ultra-processed food brands/products on Instagram (n = 623), TikTok (n = 257), and YouTube (n = 114). Both NPM were applied to assess non-compliance at the food-item level and at the advertisement level (considering posts containing at least one non-compliant food). At the food-item level, 61.28% of products exceeded at least one item of RDC 429, with the highest prevalence on TikTok (72.63%), while 93.86% were non-compliant according to PAHO, reaching 100% on TikTok and 98.5% on YouTube. At the advertisement level, 49.53% of posts contained at least one non-compliant food under RDC 429, and 74.13% under PAHO, with YouTube showing the greatest potential for restriction (62.16% RDC; 99.10% PAHO). Both models are feasible for regulating digital food advertising: the PAHO provides a robust framework, while RDC 429 offers a strategic starting point given its current implementation in Brazil.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Department of Physiological Sciences (RU), Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.