Research on incentive mechanisms for veterans’ participation in grassroots governance: An analysis based on behavioral expectations

Under the modernization of grassroots governance, veterans constitute a high-quality human resource for enhancing grassroots social governance capacity. Drawing on questionnaire survey data from 525 veterans in Guizhou Province, China, this study identifies three distinct veteran groups using latent class analysis (LCA): Utilitarian (51.3%), Mission-Oriented (23.8%), and Development-Focused (24.9%). Empirical results reveal clear heterogeneity in policy responsiveness and behavioral mechanisms across groups. First, the Utilitarian group responds most strongly to Subsidies, with participation behavior predominantly driven by economic rationality. Second, the Mission-Oriented group demonstrates honor-driven motivations, with symbolic recognition playing a central role in stimulating governance engagement. Third, the Development-Focused group prioritizes career advancement and exhibits significant responsiveness to promotion-related incentives. Based on these findings, this study constructs a mediation model of "Policy Instruments (PI)-Behavioral Expectations (BE)-Participation Behavior (PB)" and proposes an intervention pathway centered on "expectation diagnosis" and "instrument matching." By revealing the internal mechanism through which policy instruments (PI) influence participation behavior (PB) via Behavioral expectations (BE), this research provides empirical evidence and theoretical insights for shifting incentive strategies from "uniform provision" to "precision adaptation.".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351162
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on incentive mechanisms for veterans’ participation in grassroots governance: An analysis based on behavioral expectations

Shuqiong Wang, Z Zhang
PLoS ONE
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Research on incentive mechanisms for veterans’ participation in grassroots governance: An analysis based on behavioral expectations

Shuqiong Wang, Z Zhang
article en

Abstract

Under the modernization of grassroots governance, veterans constitute a high-quality human resource for enhancing grassroots social governance capacity. Drawing on questionnaire survey data from 525 veterans in Guizhou Province, China, this study identifies three distinct veteran groups using latent class analysis (LCA): Utilitarian (51.3%), Mission-Oriented (23.8%), and Development-Focused (24.9%). Empirical results reveal clear heterogeneity in policy responsiveness and behavioral mechanisms across groups. First, the Utilitarian group responds most strongly to Subsidies, with participation behavior predominantly driven by economic rationality. Second, the Mission-Oriented group demonstrates honor-driven motivations, with symbolic recognition playing a central role in stimulating governance engagement. Third, the Development-Focused group prioritizes career advancement and exhibits significant responsiveness to promotion-related incentives. Based on these findings, this study constructs a mediation model of "Policy Instruments (PI)-Behavioral Expectations (BE)-Participation Behavior (PB)" and proposes an intervention pathway centered on "expectation diagnosis" and "instrument matching." By revealing the internal mechanism through which policy instruments (PI) influence participation behavior (PB) via Behavioral expectations (BE), this research provides empirical evidence and theoretical insights for shifting incentive strategies from "uniform provision" to "precision adaptation.".

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Guizhou Minzu University (CN), Minzu Normal University of Xingyi (CN)
Guizhou Science and Technology Department
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.