The acceptability and efficacy of online clinical supervision for midwives: A mixed-methods study

PROBLEM: Clinical supervision has been shown to support midwives, but it is unclear whether online delivery would provide equivalent benefits or would require additional facilitation skills. BACKGROUND: Midwives have reported high levels of stress, burnout and moral distress, within a strained workforce. Clinical supervision can support reflection, professional development and wellbeing yet evidence on online delivery remains limited despite increased use of virtual platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: To explore midwives' perceptions of the acceptability and efficacy of clinical supervision delivered via videoconferencing. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted with midwives from two regional New South Wales Local Health Districts. Three groups participated in monthly online group clinical supervision for six months. Post-intervention survey and interview data were collected informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. FINDINGS: Eleven of fifteen participants completed the survey and six were interviewed. Online clinical supervision was viewed positively across purpose, process and impact domains. Five themes were developed from the qualitative data: finding time and space, flexibility, valuing clinical supervision, feeling safe and the online experience. Participants described online sessions as accessible, supportive and safe, with flexibility particularly beneficial for regional and early-career midwives. DISCUSSION: Online delivery supported psychological safety and reflective practice, indicating that effective supervision can occur virtually. However, participation relied on protected time, private space and reliable technology - factors that limited engagement for some midwives. CONCLUSION: Online clinical supervision was acceptable and perceived as effective, providing a safe, flexible reflective space and improving access where in-person options were limited. Successful implementation requires organisational support, reliable technology, protected time and skilled facilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women and Birth
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2026.102244
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The acceptability and efficacy of online clinical supervision for midwives: A mixed-methods study

Helen J. Donovan, Christine Catling, Allison Cummins
Women and Birth
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

The acceptability and efficacy of online clinical supervision for midwives: A mixed-methods study

Helen J. Donovan, Christine Catling, Allison Cummins
article en

Abstract

PROBLEM: Clinical supervision has been shown to support midwives, but it is unclear whether online delivery would provide equivalent benefits or would require additional facilitation skills. BACKGROUND: Midwives have reported high levels of stress, burnout and moral distress, within a strained workforce. Clinical supervision can support reflection, professional development and wellbeing yet evidence on online delivery remains limited despite increased use of virtual platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: To explore midwives' perceptions of the acceptability and efficacy of clinical supervision delivered via videoconferencing. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted with midwives from two regional New South Wales Local Health Districts. Three groups participated in monthly online group clinical supervision for six months. Post-intervention survey and interview data were collected informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. FINDINGS: Eleven of fifteen participants completed the survey and six were interviewed. Online clinical supervision was viewed positively across purpose, process and impact domains. Five themes were developed from the qualitative data: finding time and space, flexibility, valuing clinical supervision, feeling safe and the online experience. Participants described online sessions as accessible, supportive and safe, with flexibility particularly beneficial for regional and early-career midwives. DISCUSSION: Online delivery supported psychological safety and reflective practice, indicating that effective supervision can occur virtually. However, participation relied on protected time, private space and reliable technology - factors that limited engagement for some midwives. CONCLUSION: Online clinical supervision was acceptable and perceived as effective, providing a safe, flexible reflective space and improving access where in-person options were limited. Successful implementation requires organisational support, reliable technology, protected time and skilled facilitation.

Women and BirthVol. 39(4)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.