Tangible and Intangible Impacts of Flooding in Miami-Dade County: a Human-Centered Analysis

Abstract Flooding in Miami-Dade is not merely a natural hazard but a historically produced condition in which hydrologic exposure is braided with infrastructural neglect and social inequality. Conventional flood assessments emphasize material losses through cost–benefit and asset-centered frameworks, overlooking the lived and intangible dimensions of risk. This article examines the tangible and intangible repercussions of flooding in low-income, historically marginalized neighborhoods, drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2023 and 2024 in Miami-Dade’s flood-prone areas. Conducting semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and collaboration with community organizations, the study reveals how new building codes, elevation and fill practices, and speculative redevelopment redistribute both flooding risk and public attention, producing resilience for some while normalizing abandonment for others. These material vulnerabilities are compounded by health risks such as mold proliferation, wastewater exposure, and unsafe housing conditions, which disproportionately affect already vulnerable households. The result is uneven recovery, syndemic health risks, psychological exhaustion, and cultural displacement in neighborhoods long excluded from infrastructural protection. The analysis highlights that experiences of flooding are inextricably linked to broader processes of dispossession, inequality, and environmental change. It calls for reimagining flood assessment frameworks to integrate historical and cumulative harms, prioritize community knowledge, and account for cascading and nonmarket losses. Such an approach is essential to ensure that future assessments remain equitable and do not generate adaptations or policies that exacerbate flooding risks in already vulnerable communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Ecology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-026-00723-z
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tangible and Intangible Impacts of Flooding in Miami-Dade County: a Human-Centered Analysis

Nilver Tovar Ospina
Human Ecology
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Tangible and Intangible Impacts of Flooding in Miami-Dade County: a Human-Centered Analysis

Nilver Tovar Ospina
article en

Abstract

Abstract Flooding in Miami-Dade is not merely a natural hazard but a historically produced condition in which hydrologic exposure is braided with infrastructural neglect and social inequality. Conventional flood assessments emphasize material losses through cost–benefit and asset-centered frameworks, overlooking the lived and intangible dimensions of risk. This article examines the tangible and intangible repercussions of flooding in low-income, historically marginalized neighborhoods, drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2023 and 2024 in Miami-Dade’s flood-prone areas. Conducting semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and collaboration with community organizations, the study reveals how new building codes, elevation and fill practices, and speculative redevelopment redistribute both flooding risk and public attention, producing resilience for some while normalizing abandonment for others. These material vulnerabilities are compounded by health risks such as mold proliferation, wastewater exposure, and unsafe housing conditions, which disproportionately affect already vulnerable households. The result is uneven recovery, syndemic health risks, psychological exhaustion, and cultural displacement in neighborhoods long excluded from infrastructural protection. The analysis highlights that experiences of flooding are inextricably linked to broader processes of dispossession, inequality, and environmental change. It calls for reimagining flood assessment frameworks to integrate historical and cumulative harms, prioritize community knowledge, and account for cascading and nonmarket losses. Such an approach is essential to ensure that future assessments remain equitable and do not generate adaptations or policies that exacerbate flooding risks in already vulnerable communities.

Human EcologyVol. 54(4)
University of Central Florida (US)
University of Central Florida
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.