Clinical dissociation and electromyographic convergence of paratonia in cognitive impairment including Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for a shared central inhibitory mechanism

BackgroundDespite a shared conceptual framework linking both components to impaired inhibitory control, clinical evidence suggests that facilitatory and oppositional paratonia are not equally related to cognitive deterioration, with facilitatory paratonia showing a stronger association with cognitive impairment. Whether this apparent divergence reflects true neurophysiological differences or arises from limitations intrinsic to clinical assessment remains unclear. Electromyography (EMG)-based assessment offers a direct approach to quantify involuntary muscle activation and reduce measurement-related confounding factors.ObjectiveTo determine whether the reported clinical divergence between facilitatory and oppositional paratonia reflects distinct neurophysiological mechanisms or is primarily driven by measurement-related factors.MethodsEighty-six participants (46 cognitively impaired and 40 cognitively healthy) underwent clinical and EMG-based assessment of paratonia during passive elbow movements. Associations with global cognitive status (Mini-Mental State Examination) and discriminative performance between cognitively impaired and healthy subjects were evaluated.ResultsClinically assessed facilitatory paratonia showed stronger associations with cognitive status and better discriminative performance than oppositional paratonia. In contrast, EMG-based assessment revealed comparable associations with cognitive status and similar discriminative performance for both paratonia components.ConclusionsEMG assessment reveals a neurophysiological convergence between facilitatory and oppositional paratonia, supporting a shared central inhibitory mechanism. Our findings indicate that the apparent clinical distinction between facilitatory and oppositional paratonia does not reflect a true pathophysiological separation, but is largely driven by limitations inherent to clinical assessment. In this context, facilitatory paratonia emerges as the most informative bedside marker of cognitive impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261468799
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical dissociation and electromyographic convergence of paratonia in cognitive impairment including Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for a shared central inhibitory mechanism

Laura Mori, Fiammetta Monacelli, Carlo Trompetto, Daniele Diotti et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Clinical dissociation and electromyographic convergence of paratonia in cognitive impairment including Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for a shared central inhibitory mechanism

Laura Mori, Fiammetta Monacelli, Carlo Trompetto, Daniele Diotti, Lucio Marinelli, Cristina Schenone, Antonio Currà, Marta Ponzano, Lucilla Vestito, Andrea Cervia, Filippo Cotellessa, Luca Puce
article en

Abstract

BackgroundDespite a shared conceptual framework linking both components to impaired inhibitory control, clinical evidence suggests that facilitatory and oppositional paratonia are not equally related to cognitive deterioration, with facilitatory paratonia showing a stronger association with cognitive impairment. Whether this apparent divergence reflects true neurophysiological differences or arises from limitations intrinsic to clinical assessment remains unclear. Electromyography (EMG)-based assessment offers a direct approach to quantify involuntary muscle activation and reduce measurement-related confounding factors.ObjectiveTo determine whether the reported clinical divergence between facilitatory and oppositional paratonia reflects distinct neurophysiological mechanisms or is primarily driven by measurement-related factors.MethodsEighty-six participants (46 cognitively impaired and 40 cognitively healthy) underwent clinical and EMG-based assessment of paratonia during passive elbow movements. Associations with global cognitive status (Mini-Mental State Examination) and discriminative performance between cognitively impaired and healthy subjects were evaluated.ResultsClinically assessed facilitatory paratonia showed stronger associations with cognitive status and better discriminative performance than oppositional paratonia. In contrast, EMG-based assessment revealed comparable associations with cognitive status and similar discriminative performance for both paratonia components.ConclusionsEMG assessment reveals a neurophysiological convergence between facilitatory and oppositional paratonia, supporting a shared central inhibitory mechanism. Our findings indicate that the apparent clinical distinction between facilitatory and oppositional paratonia does not reflect a true pathophysiological separation, but is largely driven by limitations inherent to clinical assessment. In this context, facilitatory paratonia emerges as the most informative bedside marker of cognitive impairment.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
University of Pavia (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Ospedale Civile di Voghera (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria (IT), Link Campus University (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.