Model Transfer, the Challenge of Tractability Standards and Methodological Embedding

Abstract Domain-specific epistemic priorities determine which procedures for solving computational models are accepted in a given domain. Tractability assessments thus depend on how disciplines resolve epistemic trade-offs, and ignoring this domain-specificity renders the notion of tractability underspecified. I argue that recognizing domain-specific tractability standards reveals an overlooked challenge to model transfer: skepticism about a model’s suitability as a computational device in the new domain. Based on the case of a hybrid agent-based model in macroeconomics, I demonstrate that this challenge can sometimes be mitigated by reformulating the model’s representational mode to align with the new domain’s tractability standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10259
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Transfer, the Challenge of Tractability Standards and Methodological Embedding

Murat Bakeev
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Model Transfer, the Challenge of Tractability Standards and Methodological Embedding

Murat Bakeev
article en

Abstract

Abstract Domain-specific epistemic priorities determine which procedures for solving computational models are accepted in a given domain. Tractability assessments thus depend on how disciplines resolve epistemic trade-offs, and ignoring this domain-specificity renders the notion of tractability underspecified. I argue that recognizing domain-specific tractability standards reveals an overlooked challenge to model transfer: skepticism about a model’s suitability as a computational device in the new domain. Based on the case of a hybrid agent-based model in macroeconomics, I demonstrate that this challenge can sometimes be mitigated by reformulating the model’s representational mode to align with the new domain’s tractability standard.

Philosophy of Science
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.