Co‐Designing Physical Activity Programmes: A Participatory Research Study With Culturally Diverse Women and Local Government

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is essential for health and wellbeing, yet participation among women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds remains low due to complex, multi-level barriers. Co-design is increasingly recognised as a means of developing culturally relevant and sustainable interventions, but its application within local government-led PA programmes is limited. METHODS: Guided by the socioecological model (SEM), this study examined how co-design can be operationalised within a local government context to plan and deliver PA opportunities, alongside an exploratory analysis of short-term outcomes. A mixed-method participatory design was conducted across four phases: planning, co-creation, implementation and evaluation. SEM informed identification of barriers and enablers during workshops, while co-design principles guided collaborative strategy development. Data collection included co-design workshops (n = 76 women), pre- and post-intervention surveys (baseline n = 42; follow-up n = 21), a staff focus group and interviews with women (n = 3). Quantitative data were analysed using paired t-tests; qualitative data were thematically analysed to examine co-design processes and participant experiences. RESULTS: Co-design resulted in the development and implementation of culturally relevant programmes including group-based exercise, women's football, netball and water safety, incorporating features such as childcare, safety and opportunities for social connection. Quantitative findings indicated modest increases in PA (+34 min/week, p = 0.25), and improved physical health (p = 0.02). Qualitative findings highlighted outcomes associated with enhanced social connections and sense of empowerment, and the importance of iterative programme adaptation. CONCLUSION: Integrating SEM and co-design offers a robust framework for addressing multi-level barriers and supporting inclusive PA programmes within local government practice and strengthening community capacity and equity in health. SO WHAT?: These findings provide actionable evidence for local governments seeking to implement inclusive, culturally responsive PA initiatives, positioning co-design as a scalable approach to addressing participation inequities among women from CALD backgrounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.70217
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐Designing Physical Activity Programmes: A Participatory Research Study With Culturally Diverse Women and Local Government

Meghan Casey, Rochelle Eime, Joanne E. Porter
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Co‐Designing Physical Activity Programmes: A Participatory Research Study With Culturally Diverse Women and Local Government

Meghan Casey, Rochelle Eime, Joanne E. Porter
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is essential for health and wellbeing, yet participation among women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds remains low due to complex, multi-level barriers. Co-design is increasingly recognised as a means of developing culturally relevant and sustainable interventions, but its application within local government-led PA programmes is limited. METHODS: Guided by the socioecological model (SEM), this study examined how co-design can be operationalised within a local government context to plan and deliver PA opportunities, alongside an exploratory analysis of short-term outcomes. A mixed-method participatory design was conducted across four phases: planning, co-creation, implementation and evaluation. SEM informed identification of barriers and enablers during workshops, while co-design principles guided collaborative strategy development. Data collection included co-design workshops (n = 76 women), pre- and post-intervention surveys (baseline n = 42; follow-up n = 21), a staff focus group and interviews with women (n = 3). Quantitative data were analysed using paired t-tests; qualitative data were thematically analysed to examine co-design processes and participant experiences. RESULTS: Co-design resulted in the development and implementation of culturally relevant programmes including group-based exercise, women's football, netball and water safety, incorporating features such as childcare, safety and opportunities for social connection. Quantitative findings indicated modest increases in PA (+34 min/week, p = 0.25), and improved physical health (p = 0.02). Qualitative findings highlighted outcomes associated with enhanced social connections and sense of empowerment, and the importance of iterative programme adaptation. CONCLUSION: Integrating SEM and co-design offers a robust framework for addressing multi-level barriers and supporting inclusive PA programmes within local government practice and strengthening community capacity and equity in health. SO WHAT?: These findings provide actionable evidence for local governments seeking to implement inclusive, culturally responsive PA initiatives, positioning co-design as a scalable approach to addressing participation inequities among women from CALD backgrounds.

Health Promotion Journal of AustraliaVol. 37(4)
Federation University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.