Stillbirth and newborn data quality and use and related input and process factors: findings of the IMPULSE study in Ethiopia

Background: High quality data is mandatory when shaping action-oriented policies aimed at reducing preventable neonatal deaths. Ethiopia has a high a neonatal mortality rate, but there has been limited assessment of the quality and use of newborn data, and its contributing factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia from November 2022 to September 2023 in 35 sites: 24 facilities, 10 subnational data offices, and the Ministry of Health. We collected data using Every Newborn - Measurement Improvement for Newborn & Stillbirth Indicators tools and analysed them per the Performance of Routine Information System Management User's Kit. Results: The major strengths identified in our analysis included governance at subnational data offices (80-90%), use of quality improvement standards (100%), supervision quality (100%) in data offices, sites with internet access (92-100%), routine health information system (RHIS) designated staff (100%), data management in data offices (62-100%), data availability and completeness (91-98%) for denominator elements (total births, live births), and use of data to produce reports in data offices (100%). Regarding key gaps, data accuracy (registers vs. District Health Information Software 2) was low on all 10 newborn indicators (11-67%), while data use for performance review was suboptimal (≤90%) at both in facilities (12-66%) and data offices (21-90%). Key weaknesses in input and process factors included only 40% of data offices having a long-term financial plan for supporting RHIS, 8% of data offices and 16% of facilities having the minimum item bundle in working conditions, few sites having supplies of recording/reporting tools (15-68%, depending on the item), and supervision quality (58-62%), staff skills to perform RHIS tasks (16-40%), and data management (46-75%) being particularly low in facilities. An average of 57% of end users reported a need for improvement in the quality and use of newborn data, as well as in the studied enabling factors. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the specific strengths and weaknesses that need to be addressed to improve data quality and use in the assessed sample in Ethiopia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Health
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04231
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stillbirth and newborn data quality and use and related input and process factors: findings of the IMPULSE study in Ethiopia

Dawit Fisseha, Giovanni Putoto, Tiyese Chimuna, Tamrat Awell et al.
Journal of Global Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Stillbirth and newborn data quality and use and related input and process factors: findings of the IMPULSE study in Ethiopia

Dawit Fisseha, Giovanni Putoto, Tiyese Chimuna, Tamrat Awell, Jacqueline Minja, Aderajew Mekonnen Girmay, Meles Solomon, J Lawn, Francesca Tognon, Mary Ayele, Hailu Abebe, Belete Belgu, Lorenzo Giovanni Cora, Firehiwot Abathun, Ousman Mouhamadou, Muhumuza Kananura Rornald, Donat Shamba, Marzia Lazzerini, Peter Waiswa, Bogale Worku, Ilaria Mariani
article en

Abstract

Background: High quality data is mandatory when shaping action-oriented policies aimed at reducing preventable neonatal deaths. Ethiopia has a high a neonatal mortality rate, but there has been limited assessment of the quality and use of newborn data, and its contributing factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia from November 2022 to September 2023 in 35 sites: 24 facilities, 10 subnational data offices, and the Ministry of Health. We collected data using Every Newborn - Measurement Improvement for Newborn & Stillbirth Indicators tools and analysed them per the Performance of Routine Information System Management User's Kit. Results: The major strengths identified in our analysis included governance at subnational data offices (80-90%), use of quality improvement standards (100%), supervision quality (100%) in data offices, sites with internet access (92-100%), routine health information system (RHIS) designated staff (100%), data management in data offices (62-100%), data availability and completeness (91-98%) for denominator elements (total births, live births), and use of data to produce reports in data offices (100%). Regarding key gaps, data accuracy (registers vs. District Health Information Software 2) was low on all 10 newborn indicators (11-67%), while data use for performance review was suboptimal (≤90%) at both in facilities (12-66%) and data offices (21-90%). Key weaknesses in input and process factors included only 40% of data offices having a long-term financial plan for supporting RHIS, 8% of data offices and 16% of facilities having the minimum item bundle in working conditions, few sites having supplies of recording/reporting tools (15-68%, depending on the item), and supervision quality (58-62%), staff skills to perform RHIS tasks (16-40%), and data management (46-75%) being particularly low in facilities. An average of 57% of end users reported a need for improvement in the quality and use of newborn data, as well as in the studied enabling factors. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the specific strengths and weaknesses that need to be addressed to improve data quality and use in the assessed sample in Ethiopia.

Journal of Global HealthVol. 16
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Government of Ethiopia (ET), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Ethiopian Public Health Institute (ET), Federal Ministry of Health (ET), Ethiopian Public Health Association (ET), University of Bangui (CF), Doctors with Africa Cuamm (IT), African Population and Health Research Center (KE), Makerere University (UG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.