Гипотеза объединения всех сверх‑ОТО концепций: синтез через выбор уровня описания G

This paper proposes a hypothesis according to which existing theories of gravity beyond General Relativity — quantum gravity, modified gravity, emergent gravity, and the Infinite-Dimensional Multiverse Model — are not competing but rather describe the same physical reality at different levels of description G . The concept of G (degree of coarse-graining), borrowed from statistical physics, denotes the observer’s choice: which degrees of freedom are considered essential and which are coarse-grained into macrostates. Entropy depends not only on the number of microstates \Omega but also on the chosen G . In the same way, different gravity theories may be simultaneously valid, each at its own scale. The hypothesis comprises three theses: ontological (a single reality exists), methodological (no single theory is ultimate), and practical (the task is to describe transitions between levels). A comparison is made with other unification attempts (emergent modified gravity by Bojowald, SSUT by Sohail, CODES by Bostick, and hydrodynamics on superspace). The proposed approach is shown to be unique: it introduces an explicit meta-principle of level choice, includes infinite-dimensional geometry, and uses attractors to explain the fine-tuning of constants. However, this work is purely conceptual. It does not offer a mathematical formalisation of transitions between G , contains no direct experimental predictions, and describes no applied technologies. All ontological statements should be regarded as working hypotheses. The main value is a methodological framework that provides a fresh perspective on the relationships between gravity theories and encourages their further development and empirical testing.