Contrasting public, market-driven and populist news videos on Covid-19: A semi-automatic multimodal semiotic content analysis of audiovisual news reports

This paper introduces a novel method for investigating how public service, market-driven, and populist news outlets differ in their construction of ideological positions in audiovisual reporting. A semi-automatic framework of multimodal semiotic content analysis is presented that combines computational audiovisual feature detection with theory-driven manual annotation of discourse and narrative elements and shows early results concerning the construction of distinct positions on COVID-19. The method presented suggests a powerful reconceptualisation of what counts as “large-scale” analysis in multimodal video research, arguing that scale should be defined not merely by the number of videos but be explicitly related to analytical complexity, levels of abstraction, and the density of annotated units, such as shots and many other multimodal features. Based on a corpus of 107 German news reports (January–March 2022, containing around 5000 shots) from Tagesschau (public service), BILD TV (market-driven), and CompactTV (populist/right-wing), we systematically conduct shot-by-shot annotation for multimodal semiotic content analysis. The analysis identifies recurring narrative patterns across channels and uncovers how multimodal configurations materialise distinct ideological orientations. Statistical comparisons show clear cross-channel differences. Tagesschau foregrounds expert voices and largely avoids sen-sationalist framing. BILD TV emphasises emotionalised language associated with shock and “craziness”, while CompactTV amplifies oppositional actors and frequently frames COVID-19 measures in terms of “dictatorship” and “coercion”. These findings demonstrate that multimodal discourse patterns function as ideological performances, shaping whose voices are legitimised, how events are staged, and which emotions are mobilised. The study illustrates how semi-automatic multimodal analysis enables scalable, fine-grained investigation of narrative form and ideological signalling in contemporary news environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multimodality & Society
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795261466852
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting public, market-driven and populist news videos on Covid-19: A semi-automatic multimodal semiotic content analysis of audiovisual news reports

Eric Müller-Budack, Chiao‐I Tseng, Bernhard Liebl, John Bateman et al.
Multimodality & Society
Media Studies and Communication
article

Contrasting public, market-driven and populist news videos on Covid-19: A semi-automatic multimodal semiotic content analysis of audiovisual news reports

Eric Müller-Budack, Chiao‐I Tseng, Bernhard Liebl, John Bateman, Ralph Ewerth, Gullal S. Cheema, Manuel Burghardt
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel method for investigating how public service, market-driven, and populist news outlets differ in their construction of ideological positions in audiovisual reporting. A semi-automatic framework of multimodal semiotic content analysis is presented that combines computational audiovisual feature detection with theory-driven manual annotation of discourse and narrative elements and shows early results concerning the construction of distinct positions on COVID-19. The method presented suggests a powerful reconceptualisation of what counts as “large-scale” analysis in multimodal video research, arguing that scale should be defined not merely by the number of videos but be explicitly related to analytical complexity, levels of abstraction, and the density of annotated units, such as shots and many other multimodal features. Based on a corpus of 107 German news reports (January–March 2022, containing around 5000 shots) from Tagesschau (public service), BILD TV (market-driven), and CompactTV (populist/right-wing), we systematically conduct shot-by-shot annotation for multimodal semiotic content analysis. The analysis identifies recurring narrative patterns across channels and uncovers how multimodal configurations materialise distinct ideological orientations. Statistical comparisons show clear cross-channel differences. Tagesschau foregrounds expert voices and largely avoids sen-sationalist framing. BILD TV emphasises emotionalised language associated with shock and “craziness”, while CompactTV amplifies oppositional actors and frequently frames COVID-19 measures in terms of “dictatorship” and “coercion”. These findings demonstrate that multimodal discourse patterns function as ideological performances, shaping whose voices are legitimised, how events are staged, and which emotions are mobilised. The study illustrates how semi-automatic multimodal analysis enables scalable, fine-grained investigation of narrative form and ideological signalling in contemporary news environments.

Multimodality & Society
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) (DE), L3S Research Center (DE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Leipzig University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.