Programme-level determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening in Italy: a national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Participation in organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is influenced by multiple organisational factors; however, existing evidence has mainly focused on isolated interventions, with limited understanding of how these components jointly influence participation within real-world screening settings. This study aimed to identify the organisational determinants of participation in population-based CRC screening in Italy and to quantify their relative contribution within a real-world, decentralised healthcare system, hypothesising that participation is determined by the effect of multiple organisational domains rather than by isolated interventions. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey of Italian CRC screening programmes using a validated web-based questionnaire. Fifty-eight programmes from 17 regions were included. The outcome was the adjusted participation rate in 2022. Associations between organisational characteristics and participation were assessed using multiple fractional logistic regression models. RESULTS: The participating services covered a target population of 5.9 million individuals. Participation varied substantially across settings (range 6.5%-67.1%). In multivariable analysis, higher participation was independently associated with Northern geographic area (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.73-2.38; p < 0.001), programme duration > = 16 years (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.28-2.73; p < 0.01), the presence of a unified regional management system (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.08-1.94; p = 0.01), coordinated communication of positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.13-1.84; p = 0.003), communication by general practitioners (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.06-1.72; p = 0.014), and structured invitation procedures including educational materials and reminders. These findings suggest that participation is shaped by the effect of multiple organisational components rather than by isolated interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a system-level evaluation of organisational determinants of CRC screening participation and quantifies their relative contribution within real-world programmes. The proposed framework may support screening services in identifying priority organisational domains for intervention and in designing integrated strategies tailored to their operational context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28525-4
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Programme-level determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening in Italy: a national cross-sectional study

Riccardo Marmo, Marco Soncini, Renato Cannizzaro, Francesca Galeazzi
BMC Public Health
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Programme-level determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening in Italy: a national cross-sectional study

Riccardo Marmo, Marco Soncini, Renato Cannizzaro, Francesca Galeazzi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participation in organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is influenced by multiple organisational factors; however, existing evidence has mainly focused on isolated interventions, with limited understanding of how these components jointly influence participation within real-world screening settings. This study aimed to identify the organisational determinants of participation in population-based CRC screening in Italy and to quantify their relative contribution within a real-world, decentralised healthcare system, hypothesising that participation is determined by the effect of multiple organisational domains rather than by isolated interventions. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey of Italian CRC screening programmes using a validated web-based questionnaire. Fifty-eight programmes from 17 regions were included. The outcome was the adjusted participation rate in 2022. Associations between organisational characteristics and participation were assessed using multiple fractional logistic regression models. RESULTS: The participating services covered a target population of 5.9 million individuals. Participation varied substantially across settings (range 6.5%-67.1%). In multivariable analysis, higher participation was independently associated with Northern geographic area (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.73-2.38; p < 0.001), programme duration > = 16 years (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.28-2.73; p < 0.01), the presence of a unified regional management system (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.08-1.94; p = 0.01), coordinated communication of positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.13-1.84; p = 0.003), communication by general practitioners (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.06-1.72; p = 0.014), and structured invitation procedures including educational materials and reminders. These findings suggest that participation is shaped by the effect of multiple organisational components rather than by isolated interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a system-level evaluation of organisational determinants of CRC screening participation and quantifies their relative contribution within real-world programmes. The proposed framework may support screening services in identifying priority organisational domains for intervention and in designing integrated strategies tailored to their operational context.

BMC Public Health
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), University of Salerno (IT), University of Trieste (IT), University of Salento (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Azienda Ospedale - Università Padova (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.