What Makes the Best Educator? A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Medicine Resident Perspectives

ABSTRACT Background Effective clinical educators are essential to emergency medicine (EM) residency training, and the pace and dynamics of the emergency department require them to have a unique educational skillset. Most existing literature defining educational excellence in EM reflects educator rather than learner perspectives, and there is limited contemporary, resident‐centered work that describes the teaching practices of exceptional EM educators. This study aimed to identify EM resident‐defined practices that characterize the “best” EM educators. Methods We performed a qualitative thematic analysis to analyze open‐ended survey responses from residents at a large, urban, 3 year EM residency program. All 78 residents were invited to complete an anonymous survey containing a single prompt to describe their best EM educator. Data were collected over 72 h in March 2025. Three investigators performed iterative open coding and applied constant comparative methods to identify themes. Postgraduate year (PGY) class was unblinded after analysis to explore patterns by training level. Results Thirty‐eight residents responded (48.7% response rate). Five themes emerged: (1) growth orientation, (2) psychological safety, (3) shares clinical burden, (4) educational expertise, including optimal timing and setting of teaching, knowledge translation, and fostering independence; and (5) clinical expertise, including content expertise and role modeling. In a secondary descriptive analysis, PGY‐1s emphasized psychological safety, growth‐oriented feedback, and autonomy, while PGY‐2 and PGY‐3 residents prioritized approachability, timely teaching, shared workload, and clinical expertise. Conclusions Residents identified outstanding EM educators as growth‐oriented, supportive, skilled teachers and expert clinicians, with preferences varying by training level. These themes may guide faculty development, coaching, and feedback as well as future studies on resident‐centered educator training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AEM Education and Training
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70211
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Makes the Best Educator? A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Medicine Resident Perspectives

C. Reece Brockman, Marshall Howell, Joshua Ginsburg, D. Mark Courtney et al.
AEM Education and Training
Innovations in Medical Education
article

What Makes the Best Educator? A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Medicine Resident Perspectives

C. Reece Brockman, Marshall Howell, Joshua Ginsburg, D. Mark Courtney, Milman, Brian ; Howell, Marshall ; Ginsburg, Joshua ; Parnell, Samuel, Erin Lincoln
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Effective clinical educators are essential to emergency medicine (EM) residency training, and the pace and dynamics of the emergency department require them to have a unique educational skillset. Most existing literature defining educational excellence in EM reflects educator rather than learner perspectives, and there is limited contemporary, resident‐centered work that describes the teaching practices of exceptional EM educators. This study aimed to identify EM resident‐defined practices that characterize the “best” EM educators. Methods We performed a qualitative thematic analysis to analyze open‐ended survey responses from residents at a large, urban, 3 year EM residency program. All 78 residents were invited to complete an anonymous survey containing a single prompt to describe their best EM educator. Data were collected over 72 h in March 2025. Three investigators performed iterative open coding and applied constant comparative methods to identify themes. Postgraduate year (PGY) class was unblinded after analysis to explore patterns by training level. Results Thirty‐eight residents responded (48.7% response rate). Five themes emerged: (1) growth orientation, (2) psychological safety, (3) shares clinical burden, (4) educational expertise, including optimal timing and setting of teaching, knowledge translation, and fostering independence; and (5) clinical expertise, including content expertise and role modeling. In a secondary descriptive analysis, PGY‐1s emphasized psychological safety, growth‐oriented feedback, and autonomy, while PGY‐2 and PGY‐3 residents prioritized approachability, timely teaching, shared workload, and clinical expertise. Conclusions Residents identified outstanding EM educators as growth‐oriented, supportive, skilled teachers and expert clinicians, with preferences varying by training level. These themes may guide faculty development, coaching, and feedback as well as future studies on resident‐centered educator training.

AEM Education and TrainingVol. 10(4)
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.