Precautionary Approach to Reduce Occupational Exposures among Airport Apron Workers in the Context of Many Unknowns—A Methodological Position Paper

Airport apron workers are exposed to complex mixtures of volatile and particulate substances generated by jet fuel, exhaust from aircraft main engine and auxiliary power units (APU), and ground-service equipment. Evidence from both commercial and military airport settings indicates potentially serious health risks associated with acute and chronic exposure to these heterogeneous emissions. Emissions include CO, NOx, SO2, PAHs, UFPs, and larger particulates. In addition, there is chronic low-dose exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and organophosphates (OPs). The limited number of epidemiological studies specifically targeting apron workers report chronic respiratory symptoms. Evidence for cardiovascular effects is inconsistent, and potential neurological impacts are insufficiently explored. Some studies suggest genotoxic effects or elevated cancer risks but are insufficient to support unequivocal conclusions regarding the necessity of stringent risk management measures. Especially combined acute and chronic exposure to the mentioned volatile and airborne substances may represent a substantial but underrecognized risk, particularly with respect to neurotoxic health effects. This emphasizes the need for prospective cohort studies incorporating detailed exposure assessment, biomonitoring critical toxicological endpoints. At the same time, significant uncertainties and the limited availability of up-to-date, well-characterized exposure data, hinder effective risk assessment and management on the apron. This urges for a precautionary approach with priority for kerosene combustion-derived UFPs, due to their potential toxicity at low concentrations and their role as carriers of carcinogenic particle-bound PAHs (pb-PAHs). However, no widely accepted health-based occupational exposure limit (hb-OEL) currently exists for this nanoscale fraction, while UFPs represent a practical indicator for exposure and a useful tool for risk management. Based on existing risk assessment approaches, a combined number-based and mass-based precautionary health-considered OEL for kerosene exhaust emissions (phc-OELKEE) has been proposed. Field measurements indicate that this precautionary threshold is frequently exceeded on the airport apron.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work and Health
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/wah.2026.100015
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precautionary Approach to Reduce Occupational Exposures among Airport Apron Workers in the Context of Many Unknowns—A Methodological Position Paper

G. Hageman, Jigal Nihom
Work and Health
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Precautionary Approach to Reduce Occupational Exposures among Airport Apron Workers in the Context of Many Unknowns—A Methodological Position Paper

G. Hageman, Jigal Nihom
article en

Abstract

Airport apron workers are exposed to complex mixtures of volatile and particulate substances generated by jet fuel, exhaust from aircraft main engine and auxiliary power units (APU), and ground-service equipment. Evidence from both commercial and military airport settings indicates potentially serious health risks associated with acute and chronic exposure to these heterogeneous emissions. Emissions include CO, NOx, SO2, PAHs, UFPs, and larger particulates. In addition, there is chronic low-dose exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and organophosphates (OPs). The limited number of epidemiological studies specifically targeting apron workers report chronic respiratory symptoms. Evidence for cardiovascular effects is inconsistent, and potential neurological impacts are insufficiently explored. Some studies suggest genotoxic effects or elevated cancer risks but are insufficient to support unequivocal conclusions regarding the necessity of stringent risk management measures. Especially combined acute and chronic exposure to the mentioned volatile and airborne substances may represent a substantial but underrecognized risk, particularly with respect to neurotoxic health effects. This emphasizes the need for prospective cohort studies incorporating detailed exposure assessment, biomonitoring critical toxicological endpoints. At the same time, significant uncertainties and the limited availability of up-to-date, well-characterized exposure data, hinder effective risk assessment and management on the apron. This urges for a precautionary approach with priority for kerosene combustion-derived UFPs, due to their potential toxicity at low concentrations and their role as carriers of carcinogenic particle-bound PAHs (pb-PAHs). However, no widely accepted health-based occupational exposure limit (hb-OEL) currently exists for this nanoscale fraction, while UFPs represent a practical indicator for exposure and a useful tool for risk management. Based on existing risk assessment approaches, a combined number-based and mass-based precautionary health-considered OEL for kerosene exhaust emissions (phc-OELKEE) has been proposed. Field measurements indicate that this precautionary threshold is frequently exceeded on the airport apron.

Work and HealthVol. 2(3)
Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.