Associations of Sociodemographic and Neighborhood Vulnerability With Cardiovascular Health in Midlife Women in the United States

BACKGROUND: Many women have suboptimal cardiovascular health (CVH), which declines during midlife. Few studies have characterized CVH across the menopausal transition or identified its sociodemographic and neighborhood determinants. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort of women in eastern Massachusetts enrolled during pregnancy (1999-2002) and followed to midlife (2019-2024). Exposures included household income, education, race and ethnicity, and neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index (categorized from very low [<20th percentile] to very high [≥80th percentile]; higher categories=greater neighborhood vulnerability). Women self-reported their menopause status using questionnaires. Using Life's Essential 8, we derived CVH scores (0-100 points; higher score=better CVH) at 3-, 8-, 13-, 18-, and 23-year follow-up visits. Linear spline mixed-effect models examined associations of sociodemographics and neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index with differences in CVH across different menopause stages (premenopause, perimenopause, and postmenopause). RESULTS: Among 1200 women (mean enrollment age, 32.1 years; 67.5% Non-Hispanic White), 15.4% had household incomes ≤$40 000/y, 8.8% had ≤high school education, and 17.4% resided in very high Social Vulnerability Index neighborhoods. After covariate adjustment, women with lower income, lower education, or identifying as Non-Hispanic Black exhibited lower CVH across follow-up. Independent of individual sociodemographics, continued residence in vulnerable neighborhoods over time was associated with lower CVH and unfavorable CVH trajectories across follow-up. For example, residence in very high (versus very low) Social Vulnerability Index neighborhoods from enrollment to 3-year follow-up corresponded to mean CVH differences of -6.7 (95% CI, -12.3 to -1.2) at 3-year, -9.8 (95% CI, -15.6 to -4.0) at 8-year, -8.9 (95% CI, -13.9 to -3.9) at 13-year, -6.7 (95% CI, -12.9 to -0.5) at 18-year, and -7.2 (95% CI, -12.5 to -1.9) at 23-year follow-up, and with faster CVH score decline during premenopause (-0.62 points/y; 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Women from disadvantaged sociodemographic backgrounds or residing in vulnerable neighborhoods exhibit poorer CVH across the menopausal transition, highlighting opportunities to optimize long-term CVH and mitigate cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.126.013433
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of Sociodemographic and Neighborhood Vulnerability With Cardiovascular Health in Midlife Women in the United States

Izzuddin M. Aris, Sheryl L. Rifas‐Shiman, Li Yi, Wei Perng et al.
Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Associations of Sociodemographic and Neighborhood Vulnerability With Cardiovascular Health in Midlife Women in the United States

Izzuddin M. Aris, Sheryl L. Rifas‐Shiman, Li Yi, Wei Perng, JoAnn E. Manson, Marie‐France Hivert, Hadine Joffe, Jorge E. Chavarro, Zhi Lin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many women have suboptimal cardiovascular health (CVH), which declines during midlife. Few studies have characterized CVH across the menopausal transition or identified its sociodemographic and neighborhood determinants. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort of women in eastern Massachusetts enrolled during pregnancy (1999-2002) and followed to midlife (2019-2024). Exposures included household income, education, race and ethnicity, and neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index (categorized from very low [<20th percentile] to very high [≥80th percentile]; higher categories=greater neighborhood vulnerability). Women self-reported their menopause status using questionnaires. Using Life's Essential 8, we derived CVH scores (0-100 points; higher score=better CVH) at 3-, 8-, 13-, 18-, and 23-year follow-up visits. Linear spline mixed-effect models examined associations of sociodemographics and neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index with differences in CVH across different menopause stages (premenopause, perimenopause, and postmenopause). RESULTS: Among 1200 women (mean enrollment age, 32.1 years; 67.5% Non-Hispanic White), 15.4% had household incomes ≤$40 000/y, 8.8% had ≤high school education, and 17.4% resided in very high Social Vulnerability Index neighborhoods. After covariate adjustment, women with lower income, lower education, or identifying as Non-Hispanic Black exhibited lower CVH across follow-up. Independent of individual sociodemographics, continued residence in vulnerable neighborhoods over time was associated with lower CVH and unfavorable CVH trajectories across follow-up. For example, residence in very high (versus very low) Social Vulnerability Index neighborhoods from enrollment to 3-year follow-up corresponded to mean CVH differences of -6.7 (95% CI, -12.3 to -1.2) at 3-year, -9.8 (95% CI, -15.6 to -4.0) at 8-year, -8.9 (95% CI, -13.9 to -3.9) at 13-year, -6.7 (95% CI, -12.9 to -0.5) at 18-year, and -7.2 (95% CI, -12.5 to -1.9) at 23-year follow-up, and with faster CVH score decline during premenopause (-0.62 points/y; 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Women from disadvantaged sociodemographic backgrounds or residing in vulnerable neighborhoods exhibit poorer CVH across the menopausal transition, highlighting opportunities to optimize long-term CVH and mitigate cardiovascular disease risk.

Circulation Population Health and Outcomes
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.