Comprehensive clinical and genomic analysis of early onset cancer of the bladder and upper urinary tract

BACKGROUND: Urothelial cancer typically affects older adults, yet early-onset urothelial cancer (EO-UC, age ≤ 45 years) cases are rising and remain poorly characterized. We hypothesized that EO-UC exhibits distinct clinical and genomic features that reflect a different biological etiology from standard-onset UC (SO-UC). METHODS: We compared clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics of patients with EO-UC versus SO-UC evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2000 through 2024. Clinical data included 9,221 patients, with tumor and germline genomic profiling by MSK-IMPACT in 2,753 patients. RESULTS: EO-UC accounted for 335/9,221 (3.6%) cases. EO-UC patients were more likely never-smokers (43% vs 26%, p < 0.001), female (30% vs 25%, p = 0.034), and of Asian race (7.4% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001). EO-UC tumors were more often low-grade (41% vs 23%, p < 0.001) and of pure non-urothelial histology (4.0% vs 1.7%, p = 0.003). EO-UC showed marked enrichment for HRAS mutations, independent of histologic subtype, and HRAS-mutated tumors had reduced APOBEC-associated mutation signatures. Germline pathogenic variants were detected in 21.0% of EO-UC vs 17.2% of SO-UC patients (p = 0.43), driven mostly by mismatch repair and MUTYH gene alterations. Rare cases of somatic mosaicism in HRAS and ERCC2 were observed in patients with very early-onset disease. CONCLUSIONS: EO-UC represents a biologically distinct subset characterized by HRAS-driven oncogenesis, reduced APOBEC mutagenesis, frequent germline variants, and, rarely, somatic mosaicism. These findings suggest developmental or genetic mechanisms underlying EO-UC, and supporting age- and biology-informed approaches to risk assessment, genetic counseling, and targeted therapy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag229
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive clinical and genomic analysis of early onset cancer of the bladder and upper urinary tract

Abbass Mg, Kenneth Offit, S A Funt, Lauren Gabriele Banaszak et al.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Comprehensive clinical and genomic analysis of early onset cancer of the bladder and upper urinary tract

Abbass Mg, Kenneth Offit, S A Funt, Lauren Gabriele Banaszak, Timothy F. Donahue, Richard S. Matulewicz, Rania Sheikh, Irina Ostrovnaya, D B Solit, Cansu Yol, Gopa Iyer, David H. Aggen, Andrew T. Lenis, Maria Isabel Carlo, J E Eichholz, K. Eugene, Bernard H. Bochner, Liu Y, Charlie White, Sherri Machele Donat, Zsofia Stadler, Jonathan Rosenberg, Harry Herr, Hong Truong, Eugene Pietzak, Alicia Latham, Henry Walch, N Liso, Jonathan A Coleman, Peter Reisz, Nikolaus Schultz, Yonina R Murciano-Goroff, Yelena Kemel, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Diana Mandelker, Walid K Chatila, Merve Basar, Victor Reuter, Robert C Smith, Alvin C Goh
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urothelial cancer typically affects older adults, yet early-onset urothelial cancer (EO-UC, age ≤ 45 years) cases are rising and remain poorly characterized. We hypothesized that EO-UC exhibits distinct clinical and genomic features that reflect a different biological etiology from standard-onset UC (SO-UC). METHODS: We compared clinical, pathologic, and genomic characteristics of patients with EO-UC versus SO-UC evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2000 through 2024. Clinical data included 9,221 patients, with tumor and germline genomic profiling by MSK-IMPACT in 2,753 patients. RESULTS: EO-UC accounted for 335/9,221 (3.6%) cases. EO-UC patients were more likely never-smokers (43% vs 26%, p < 0.001), female (30% vs 25%, p = 0.034), and of Asian race (7.4% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001). EO-UC tumors were more often low-grade (41% vs 23%, p < 0.001) and of pure non-urothelial histology (4.0% vs 1.7%, p = 0.003). EO-UC showed marked enrichment for HRAS mutations, independent of histologic subtype, and HRAS-mutated tumors had reduced APOBEC-associated mutation signatures. Germline pathogenic variants were detected in 21.0% of EO-UC vs 17.2% of SO-UC patients (p = 0.43), driven mostly by mismatch repair and MUTYH gene alterations. Rare cases of somatic mosaicism in HRAS and ERCC2 were observed in patients with very early-onset disease. CONCLUSIONS: EO-UC represents a biologically distinct subset characterized by HRAS-driven oncogenesis, reduced APOBEC mutagenesis, frequent germline variants, and, rarely, somatic mosaicism. These findings suggest developmental or genetic mechanisms underlying EO-UC, and supporting age- and biology-informed approaches to risk assessment, genetic counseling, and targeted therapy development.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Kettering University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.