Heterosexism and health: Exploring the relationship between LGBTQ+ minority stress and somatic symptoms

Gender and sexual minorities (GSMs) experience poorer health outcomes compared to their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts, and the minority stress theory could explain these differences. A variety of individual minority stressors (e.g., vigilance, harassment and discrimination, gender expression, parenting, victimization, family of origin, vicarious trauma, isolation, and HIV/AIDS) are related to health outcomes. Yet, the comparative weight these stressors have on health outcomes is not fully understood, as few studies have directly compared these stressors within a single sample. Thus, the present study investigates the relationship between nine individual minority stressors and health outcomes (i.e., somatic symptoms) within a single sample (N = 115) of LGBTQ-identifying adults residing in the US. Online self-report questionnaires were used in simultaneous multiple regression, and results indicated that the nine minority stressors accounted for significant variability in somatic symptoms (F[11, 99] = 3.36, p < .001, R2 = .272). Family of origin (β =.22, p=.04) and vicarious trauma (β =.21, p=.04) accounted for significant variance in somatic symptoms. Findings suggest that family-based stigma and vicarious trauma may be two of the most crucial minority stress domains contributing to health outcomes, elucidating the need for increased policy and intervention efforts focused on improving family support and decreasing exposure to secondary trauma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/29933021.2026.2702345
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterosexism and health: Exploring the relationship between LGBTQ+ minority stress and somatic symptoms

Katherine Musacchio Schafer, Julia Dodd, Rachel M. Schott
Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Heterosexism and health: Exploring the relationship between LGBTQ+ minority stress and somatic symptoms

Katherine Musacchio Schafer, Julia Dodd, Rachel M. Schott
article en

Abstract

Gender and sexual minorities (GSMs) experience poorer health outcomes compared to their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts, and the minority stress theory could explain these differences. A variety of individual minority stressors (e.g., vigilance, harassment and discrimination, gender expression, parenting, victimization, family of origin, vicarious trauma, isolation, and HIV/AIDS) are related to health outcomes. Yet, the comparative weight these stressors have on health outcomes is not fully understood, as few studies have directly compared these stressors within a single sample. Thus, the present study investigates the relationship between nine individual minority stressors and health outcomes (i.e., somatic symptoms) within a single sample (N = 115) of LGBTQ-identifying adults residing in the US. Online self-report questionnaires were used in simultaneous multiple regression, and results indicated that the nine minority stressors accounted for significant variability in somatic symptoms (F[11, 99] = 3.36, p < .001, R2 = .272). Family of origin (β =.22, p=.04) and vicarious trauma (β =.21, p=.04) accounted for significant variance in somatic symptoms. Findings suggest that family-based stigma and vicarious trauma may be two of the most crucial minority stress domains contributing to health outcomes, elucidating the need for increased policy and intervention efforts focused on improving family support and decreasing exposure to secondary trauma.

Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services
East Tennessee State University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.