Impact of KRAS Mutation on Recurrence-Free Survival in Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Predominantly Hispanic Population

Introduction: For colon cancer (CC), KRAS mutations are associated with worse outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced-stage CC may proffer some survival benefits for select patients. We sought to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality among mutant and wildtype KRAS patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for advanced CC. Methods: We identified 80 patients with CC from an institutional HIPEC database. Patients were categorized based on the presence (mutKRAS) or absence (wildtype) of KRAS mutations. Patient characteristics, tumor factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Postoperative morbidity was measured by Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Overall, 52 (65%) mutKRAS were identified. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar among groups. While not significant, the wildtype group had a lower median (IQR) preoperative PCI score of 7 (3, 12) than the mutKRAS group, whose score was 11 (5, 21) (p = 0.057). The mutKRAS group had a higher rate of CDC grade 3 or more (23.1%) compared to the wildtype group (7.1%) (p = 0.015). Despite this, there were no significant differences in length of stay. Moreover, RFS between the mutKRAS and wildtype groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.47). Conclusions: Contrary to the typical association of KRAS mutations with poorer survival in CC, our findings suggest that patients with this mutation have an RFS comparable to those without it when treated with CRS/HIPEC. This may imply that CRS/HIPEC offers therapeutic benefits for KRAS-mutant CC patients, potentially mitigating the usually adverse prognosis associated with this mutation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18142301
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of KRAS Mutation on Recurrence-Free Survival in Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Predominantly Hispanic Population

Mecker G. Möller, Daniel Noe, Peter Borowsky, Sina Yadegarynia et al.
Cancers
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Impact of KRAS Mutation on Recurrence-Free Survival in Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Predominantly Hispanic Population

Mecker G. Möller, Daniel Noe, Peter Borowsky, Sina Yadegarynia, Heidi Bahna, Kimberly P. Gomez, Alexandra E Hernandez, Charles J. Cash, Agustin Pimentel, Mariaugusta Montealegre
article en

Abstract

Introduction: For colon cancer (CC), KRAS mutations are associated with worse outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced-stage CC may proffer some survival benefits for select patients. We sought to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality among mutant and wildtype KRAS patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for advanced CC. Methods: We identified 80 patients with CC from an institutional HIPEC database. Patients were categorized based on the presence (mutKRAS) or absence (wildtype) of KRAS mutations. Patient characteristics, tumor factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Postoperative morbidity was measured by Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: Overall, 52 (65%) mutKRAS were identified. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar among groups. While not significant, the wildtype group had a lower median (IQR) preoperative PCI score of 7 (3, 12) than the mutKRAS group, whose score was 11 (5, 21) (p = 0.057). The mutKRAS group had a higher rate of CDC grade 3 or more (23.1%) compared to the wildtype group (7.1%) (p = 0.015). Despite this, there were no significant differences in length of stay. Moreover, RFS between the mutKRAS and wildtype groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.47). Conclusions: Contrary to the typical association of KRAS mutations with poorer survival in CC, our findings suggest that patients with this mutation have an RFS comparable to those without it when treated with CRS/HIPEC. This may imply that CRS/HIPEC offers therapeutic benefits for KRAS-mutant CC patients, potentially mitigating the usually adverse prognosis associated with this mutation.

CancersVol. 18(14)
University of Miami (US), University of Chicago (US), John F. Kennedy Medical Center (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.